

| Subject: | Re: to all WELDERS:advice needed on exhaust |
| From: | Dennis Haynes |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:48:20 -0400 |
A better option is to replace just the one pipe. By tge time you pay someone to weld it, you'll be halfway there. Welding close to the head will destroy the gasket anyway. Brazing will not last that long and if you have a torch hot enough to do that, you can get the studs out. Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Gary Goldey Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:49 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: to all WELDERS:advice needed on exhaust Just like celebrities die in threes (Ronald Reagan, Tony Randall, Ray Charles) so do my vehicles. My 1984 Vanagon is one of them. A complete exhaust is too expensive right now, considering that I may have to have someone else do the work. I just dot have time or a place and no torches anyway. My main exhaust problem is that thumb sized hole where you connect the pipe to the head. I was thinking of getting some 1 1/2? inch tube from JC Whitney and welding it on to the flange without removing the flange from the head. I see broken studs happening if I try to remove them. I know it's only a quick, less expensive improper fix and I promise to replace the whole system when I have the cash. MY QUESTION: do you think there is any real potential DAMAGE that can be caused to the 1.9 waterboxer head? As from the heat from welding this pipe on to the flange without removing the flange from the head is a bit odd and backwards in itself and someone out there is chuckling to themselves. Any true life experiences are appreciated g. 1984 passenger Vanagon "Squeaky Fromme" 1972 VW Baha Bug "The Beast" 1970 Parts Beetle "parts for sale" My VW Vanagon site http://dieselslave.tripod.com EBay stuff http://members.ebay.com/ws2/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&userid=dieselslav e
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »