

| Subject: | Re: vanagon single electrode plugs |
| From: | Daniel L. Katz |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jun 2004 02:23:00 -0400 |
list: i feel compelled to defend the attempt to analyze a 4 electrode plug as four parallel resistances - because it is a brilliant generalization. but sparks are a complicated transient phenomena, and it is also true that one path will spark first, and later sparks may or may not form across the other paths on the same combustion stroke. the real fly in the ointment is that "R" is not a constant. in fact, R is a function of the current itself, and drops from essentially infinity across an initially unionized gap, to maybe 1,000 ohms or less at peak spark current. in other words, the gap is an example of a nonohmic device, i.e., one that does not obey ohm's law. in the original post, the equations for parallel resistances and electrical power dissipated in resitors are correct. also, recall that the coil is not a power supply. in any case, there is no mechanism for a single vs multi electrode plug to damage a coil. dan On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 05:10:03 -0700, Chris S. <mrpolak@YAHOO.COM> wrote: >--- developtrust <developtrust@COX.NET> wrote: >> Does not make sense. Electricity will always take the least >> path of >> resistance. Right? William > >> > To me, if you provide four paths to ground then the >> impedance of the plug >> > becomes R/4 since said paths are in parallel. Substituting >> into above >> > formula you get Power=4*V^2/R or four times the power is >> required from the >> > coil. > >You are correct William, and the above formula is not. The >quad-tip spark fires only ONE spark at ONE time. > > > >===== >Chris S.'85 Westy Camel -> http://www.knology.net/~vw/dadada.jpg'84 Westy Hershey -> http://www.knology.net/~vwghost/hershey/'01 NB TDI -> http://www.knology.net/~vw/Beetle.jpg
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »