

| Subject: | Re: Fuel Octane, Additives |
| From: | Mark Tuovinen |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:36:21 -0800 |
No knock sensors on a 1964 1/2 Mustang. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net> Date: Monday, July 12, 2004 2:50 pm Subject: Re: Fuel Octane, Additives > At 17:22 7/12/2004, Mark Tuovinen wrote: > >My Audi calls for 91 octane fuel and I have observed over several > years > >and varying weather/driving conditions that it does indeed get > improved > >mileage and run better with 91 octane vs 87. Enough so to easily > justify > >the higher fuel cost, the mileage difference alone more then > covers the > >cost variance. > > > >with the higher octane fuel, and ran better too. In fact the 91 > octane > >fuel burned so much better that it increased the idle speed and > we had to > >readjust it. The differences were probably more noticable on the > car we > >used then most people would see as it called for a minimum of 99 > octane. > Or to put both of these things a different way, modern engine- > management > systems with knock sensors were able to retard the timing enough > that you > could get degraded performance instead of blowing holes in your > engine? I > don't want to be dismissive but in all honesty it's hard not to. > It's not > any sort of secret that engines designed for high octane (i.e. > high > resistance to detonation, using the properties of the substance > octane as > representing 100 on the scale (and then fudged around later > somewhat)) have > to have that quality to work properly and until recently, to > survive. Likewise it's not in any question that a) engines gain > nothing > from an octane number higher than they need under given > circumstances, > which one hopes will be covered under the mfr's specification; and > b) that > chemically speaking, gasoline with high octane properties has > measurably > less energy per unit than gasoline with lower octane qualities. > > But "premium" -- more to it (maybe) than octane. And there was > certainly a > time when EFI systems that had plenty of octane number from > regular gas, > didn't get enough detergent from it to keep injectors clean. Now > they do, > in US anyway, because it's Federally mandated. But only enough to > keep > them clean, not necessarily to clean them. So if there's a > question in > this area, it seems to me that it's best to specifically dismiss > octane and > look a bit closer. > > thanks, > david > > > > > -- > David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- > http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/'84 Westy "Dutiful Passage," > '85 GL "Poor Relation" > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »