

| Subject: | Re: wbx performance |
| From: | Stan Wilder |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:16:51 -0500 |
I totally understand the desire for a little more pop from the wbx, but please consider the environment when selecting your exhaust! im sure most list members who enjoy the great outdoors will agree. For me the xtra few HP gained by removing the cat is just not worth choking for. ------------------ Clip --------------------------------- 90% 0f the SUV, MPVs and other truck chasis vehicles don't even approach passenger car standards for Emissions. The same polluting engine in my 86 Olds Custom Cruiser with 165K on it would pass inspection in a 1996 Chevy Suburban simply because they aren't classified the same and emissions restrictions are much less. Ever notice that they seldom advertize a 300 hp passenger car but often tout the 300 + hp in big SUVs. If they had to tame the emissions back to passenger car standards they'd be way below the 300 + hp. Might be right down with me at 165/195 hp. Stan Wilder www.engineceramics.com .
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »