

| Subject: | Re: Failed Emissions Check |
| From: | Warren McQuiggan |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:06:05 -0700 |
We all have to respect Joy and her opinions as she is a professional environmentalist and as such has no choice but to take the hard line. Myself on the other hand love my Vanagons so much that I'll cheat a little to assure they continue to make it down the road for a few more years. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joy Hecht" <jhecht@ALUM.MIT.EDU> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 6:30 AM Subject: Re: Failed Emissions Check > Craig, > > I'll agree my comment was judgmental. But there's a difference between > helping people identify and fix an emissions problem and helping people > cheat on their emissions test. I'm all for the former, which I thought > was > what the list was about. I'm not for the latter. Polluting isn't a > victimless crime, and I'm sorry to be on a list used to facilitate it. > > > Joy > > **************************************************************** > Joy Hecht > and Matilda, 1989 Burgundy Vanagon > > For musings about life and the vanadventures: > http://users.rcn.com/jhecht/gypsy > > ****************************************************************:::-----Orig > inal Message----- > :::From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf > :::Of Craig Oda > :::Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 12:33 AM > :::To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > :::Subject: Re: Failed Emissions Check > ::: > :::Joy, sorry, but this comment seems too judgemental. It might make > :::people reluctant to share information. I think that people should > :::share information on factors that affect emissions testing and let the > :::individuals decide whether to try tricks to pass emissions testing. > ::: > :::There may be people on the list that don't care about the environment. > ::: There may be people that care deeply about the health of the planet. > :::There may be gross polluters and there may be people that lust for low > :::emissions vehicles. There may be people that share the same views > :::as you on religion, politics, and the environment. However, there are > :::people that have different views too. > ::: > :::I'm not here to discuss religion, politics, the olympics, or the > :::environment. Let's keep the topic to the vans. > ::: > :::On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:25:39 -0400, Joy Hecht <jhecht@alum.mit.edu> > :::wrote: > :::> Hi all, > :::> > :::> I know it's nice to pass your emissions test without any expense, but > :::you > :::> know, those emissions tests are there for a reason, and it's not > simply > :::to > :::> hassle us. NOX emissions are harmful to all of us, and to the > natural > :::> environment of which we are one small part - those controls are there > :::to > :::> protect people and animals and plants, not to make the government > feel > :::> powerful. > :::> > :::> I think we all enjoy the opportunity that our vans give us to travel > :::and > :::> experience the environment. Is it really acceptable to cheat on your > :::> emissions tests to save yourself a couple of hundred bucks, but pass > on > :::the > :::> harm you cause to the environment to hurt other people? > :::> > :::> I'd be disappointed if most of the people in this community felt it > :::was. > :::> > :::> Joy > :::> > :::> **************************************************************** > :::> Joy Hecht > :::> and Matilda, 1989 Burgundy Vanagon > :::> > :::> For musings about life and the vanadventures: > :::> http://users.rcn.com/jhecht/gypsy > :::> > :::> > ****************************************************************:::---- > :::-Orig > :::> inal Message----- > :::> :::From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On > :::Behalf > :::> :::Of Bob Stevens > :::> :::Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 5:30 PM > :::> :::To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > :::> :::Subject: Re: Failed Emissions Check > :::> ::: > :::> :::Both W-boxer and TIICO emissions experience: I have failed > emissions > :::in > :::> > :::> > :::> :::this > :::> :::area in the past with both motors, went home and retarded the > :::advance to > :::> :::about "0", took it back and passed with flying colors. Back home > and > :::> :::advance > :::> :::the timing to where it is recommended (5-6 w-boxer, 10-12 TIICO) > and > :::> :::done. > :::> ::: > :::> :::Bob Stevens > :::> ::: > :::> :::http://groups.msn.com/BobsPhotoShare > :::> :::http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tiico > :::> ::: > :::> ::::::-----Original Message----- > :::> ::::::From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] > On > :::> :::Behalf > :::> ::::::Of Melvin Mudgett-Price > :::> ::::::Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:11 AM > :::> ::::::To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > :::> ::::::Subject: Failed Emissions Check > :::> :::::: > :::> ::::::Took my van for its Ohio e-Check yesterday. The engine has > 20,000 > :::on a > :::> ::::::rebuilt Boston Bob. It passed with flying colors 2 years ago. > :::This > :::> :::time > :::> ::::::it failed on Nitrous Oxide emissions, they are supposed to be > :::around > :::> ::::::900, mine were 1,900. > :::> :::::: > :::> ::::::I called my regular mechanic (VW specialist) and he said there > :::was > :::> ::::::nothing he could do, when van's start failing their emissions > :::test > :::> ::::::that's usually the end for them. This sounds like total bs to > me > :::and I > :::> ::::::don't know why he doesn't seem to want to even look at the van. > :::Called > :::> ::::::another VW shop and they said no problem, bring it in. > :::> :::::: > :::> ::::::Now to my question. What sort of things would cause the "NO" to > :::be > :::> :::high. > :::> ::::::I would like have some idea not because the mechanic will try > :::> :::bamboozle > :::> ::::::me but because I don't like to be in the position where he > could. > :::> :::::: > :::> ::::::Thanks > :::> ::::::Melvin > :::> ::::::83.5 Westy > :::> > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »