

| Subject: | Re: Question about running reflective tint in CA |
| From: | Bruce Nadig |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:30:39 -0500 |
I'm preparing to have my Vanagon windows tinted soon also. I have some questions. I have heard a few people (such as below) say that the dark, non-metallic or non-reflective tint only makes the vehicle interior hotter. I have had two cars with dark, non-reflective tint on them, and I don't feel that this is the case. I don't have any hard and fast data to back this up. I do want to put dark tint company on the van. I want to do this because I just think that the dark look would be better on my Vanagon than the silver or reflective look. Can anyone offer any hard and fast data (data is what I am looking for, not conjecture) showing that dark tint retains heat? I can believe and accept that dark may be less effective than reflective. But my question is whether or not dark tint does not work or is actually counter-productive. Cheers, Bruce motorbruce motorbruce@hotmail.com >From: Doug in Calif <vanagon@ASTOUND.NET> >Reply-To: Doug in Calif <vanagon@ASTOUND.NET> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Question about running reflective tint in CA >Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 14:29:12 -0700 > >Any other vanagon folks have any experiences with running various types of >window tint in CA or Oregon, Nevada, AZ, WY, WA, ID, UT, or other places I >may travel out west. > >Here's the specifics to my questions: > >The non reflective "dark limo" tint will actually raise the interior temps >of your van. >It absorbs heat and radiates this heat into the van. > >The "reflective" (slightly mirrored) tint will reject this heat energy and >will cool down the interior. > >State laws on tint are all over the place on what is legal. > >CA has a MNIR law which states (must not increase reflectivity) > >Yet I could not find the specifc MNIR vehicle code. > >The closest thing is could find is 26708.a-1 >Which pertains to blocking of light not reflectivity. >This would also not allow you to tint the back window at all. > >I called my local police and call the local California Highway Patrol and >they told me "the way its enforced" >is you can put whatever you want on the back and sides just not the >windshield and front drivers/ pass windows. > >I asked specificly about a "reflective or mirrored" tinting and was told >"no, you should not have any problem with that, just as long as its only on >the back and side windows". > >The guy at Tap Plastics told me the (reflective, mirrored, metallic) types >of tint are only sold for residential use and not "recommended" for auto >applications. > >Reason given is the mirrored tint can reflect sunlight into the eyes of >other drivers. > >The reflective tint is the only tint that has the heat rejection ratings >that are worth putting on. >The dark limo tint is junk in my opinion. > >Any thoughts of California enforcement or what others have had as far as >other states on this would be appreciated. > >Just trying to keep the solar gain down out here in CA, temps near 100 >today. > >Thanks, > >Doug
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »