

| Subject: | Re: Stand or Bench for engine? |
| From: | Dave Rogers |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:47:50 -0700 |
This is a little far-fetched but I'm going to tell it anyway & it's not even Friday. I worked for a VW dealer in the early 60's & built many 36 & 40 hp aircooled engines. We had nice engine stands & it was very handy to pull a pin & tilt the engine any way you desired during assembly. Later I became a machine repairman in the employ of Generous Motors but still built many engines on the side & I fashioned a vw adaptor to a commercial engine stand so I could continue to tilt those babies around. It was well after I had quit building engines for anyone other than myself that another machine repairman transferred to our plant & gave me cause for reflection. He was an avid & successful drag racer & built small block Chevies. He had a figure which I am unable to state now(CRS) of the number of horsepower it cost him to build an engine on a stand. He SWORE that he could build two engines, everything the same except one was built on a bench with everything free to flex, the other on a stand & the free to flex one would consistantly develop more horsepower. Anyway I have never sought to prove or disprove this theory & am unlikely to be building any more engines unless my Westie should blow, & would myself prefer to use a stand but am throwing it out for discussion, controversy, flames, whatever. So whataya think, Is he full of it?
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »