

| Subject: | Re: 101 MPH Vanagon! |
| From: | Bruce Nadig |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:51:56 -0500 |
Ben, Very interesting. I too found that 95 seemed to be some sort of invisible wall. However, once breached, things picked up again. I think it may be something sort of similar to the turbulence an aircraft can experience immediately before going supersonic. Cheers, Bruce Sub-Sonic (for now) motorbruce@hotmail.com >From: BenT <syncro@gmail.com> >Reply-To: BenT <syncro@gmail.com> >To: Bruce Nadig <motorbruce@hotmail.com> >CC: vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com >Subject: Re: 101 MPH Vanagon! >Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:39:36 -0700 > >i routinely go 115mph in one of my non-VW powered vans. i did seem to >hit an aerodynamic threshold at around 95mph. the old manual mirros >typically gave me notice by reaching their holding threshold and >slamming on the sides of the van simultaneously. i have fixed said >problem by installion a pair of unpowered power mirror assemblies. > >i routinely race past hopped up little import cars. though i must >admit that the prospect of a huge brick flying by them is probably >what causes them to accidentally release their foot from their >throttles. > >benT >http://members.aol.com/bentbtstr8/myhomepage/index.html > > >On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:16:05 -0500, Bruce Nadig <motorbruce@hotmail.com> >wrote: > > Howdy All, > > > > As of last Wednesday, I successfully completed my first 1,000 miles in > > Project Vanagon (Vincent) since I installed the '87 Porsche 3.2 liter > > Carrera engine and G50 transmission. Over the weekend my buddy, and >Porsche > > Master Technician, Steve came over, and we (mostly Steve) adjusted the > > valves. I still need to do an oil and filter change, but that should >happen > > in the next couple of days. > > > > Anyhow, today I had to drive down to San Antonio to take care of some > > business. That gave me my first extended trip in the van, and it was on > > fairly straight, although frequently congested, Interstate 35. On the >way to > > San Antonio I was able to achieve 101 MPH in 4th gear (the G50 'box is a > > 5-speed). I would have kept going, but I had to slow for traffic. For a > > brick, 101 isn't too bad. > > > > On the way home, I had a couple more opportunities to let Vincent >stretch > > his legs. Once again I got him up to 101 mph in 4th but had to slow for > > traffic. The greatest achievement of this second top speed run is that >it > > was uphill, into the wind. Vincent was still pulling hard and >accelerating > > in 4th as I went uphill. Once again, I ultimately had to slow for >traffic. > > > > I have a set of South African Big Brakes, but I haven't installed them >yet. > > I did, however, realize one additional braking characteristic of the > > Vanagon: if you lift off the throttle at 101, the van itself acts as its >own > > aerodynamic brake. Man, once you are off the gas things things slow down > > FAST. > > > > I wish that traffic had been a little bit lighter so that I could have > > gotten up a bit more steam and seen what Vincent would do in 5th. All in > > all, I can't complain. 101mph in 4th, uphill, into the wind makes me >happy > > for now. > > > > By the way, I feel very confident that the indicated speed was accurate. >I > > have had my speedometer calibrated. In addition, I went through a > > construction zone that has one of those portable radar trailers that > > displays your speed. At that time it displayed 73mph, exactly what was > > showing on my speedo. > > > > Once I got closer to Austin I did have one of my first stealth >encounters. A > > silver Honda with all sorts of decals and a huge can hanging off the >back > > passed me. Traffic was light enough at that point that I was able to >thread > > my way up to him and take him by surprise. I don't know what was going > > through his mind, but I'd like to know what he was thinking. > > > > Now I need to make arrangements to get some dyno time. > > > > Cheers, > > motorbruce@hotmail.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »