

| Subject: | Re: 101 MPH Vanagon! |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:02:52 +1300 |
>On 10/16/04 5:04 AM, "Andrew Grebneff" ><andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ> wrote: > >>> 3.2 liters equals 195.276 cubic inches I believe. >> >> What the heck are cubic INCHES?? >> >> >That is a good question for the younger members of the list. This is an old >measurement once used on american metal produced prior to some time in the >70s. 427cid 428cid and 440cid were once considered ideal numbers. Even >better than the xx-xx-xx series once discussed in that era as well. My question was tongue-in-cheek, but does reflect today's usage. The nondecimal system was always ridiculously clumsy, and I never could remember how many feet or yards there were in a mile, even as a kid in Canada in the 60s. -- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin New Zealand Fossil preparator <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »