

| Subject: | Re: 101 MPH Vanagon! |
| From: | Al Knoll |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:56:45 -0700 |
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:02:52 +1300 From: Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ> Subject: Re: 101 MPH Vanagon! >On 10/16/04 5:04 AM, "Andrew Grebneff" ><andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ> wrote: > >>> 3.2 liters equals 195.276 cubic inches I believe. >> >> What the heck are cubic INCHES?? >> >> >That is a good question for the younger members of the list. This is an old >measurement once used on american metal produced prior to some time in the >70s. 427cid 428cid and 440cid were once considered ideal numbers. Even >better than the xx-xx-xx series once discussed in that era as well. >>>My question was tongue-in-cheek, but does reflect today's usage. The nondecimal system was always ridiculously clumsy, and I never could remember how many feet or yards there were in a mile, even as a kid in Canada in the 60s. <<< Fortunately for you, those numbers don't change often. They're still the same as they were in the 60s even in Canada. pensioner (60CI ~ 1000cc = 1.0ltr)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »