

| Subject: | Re: aerodynamics, was: 101 MPH Vanagon! |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:54:53 +1300 |
>One of my first impressions of the my 85 sunroof the day I bought it used in >97 and drove it home was how effortless it cruised at 70-75 compared to all >the >non vanagon busses I have owned and driven over the past 30 years. My 75 bus cruised effortlessly at 130kmh (~80mph), and would happily do more. Something was wrong with US-market engines... probably the smog gear. Though Aussie-market T3 1.9s performed well, and they had smog gear. >Interesting. I wonder if a spoiler on the rear roof that directs >air down over the rear window and some type of spoiler for the >luggage rack (or a canvas cover) would make any improvements? I think a rear spoiler is supposed to create a separation in the airstream to reduce drag, not to direct air onto the rear window. As it is, the rear window on my spoilerless bus never developd dust deposits, so maybe it NEEDS a spoiler... I'm looking into modifying a factory mazda Bongo bus spoiler to fit (would need widening). -- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin New Zealand Fossil preparator <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »