Gnarlie,

Your attempt to twist this into a partisan bash is not appropriate!

As for my caution regarding "Bev Harris" (not K. Harris), anyone can spend
the same 45 minutes I did using Google - there's plenty to read.  I
carefully avoided stating any specifics.  But anyone that's been around
understands that people sometimes have hidden agendas while pretending to be
neutral.  I have a real concern based upon my reading.  YMMV

As for electronic voting, there have been hundreds of well researched papers
by highly qualified people warning about the premature push into EV, even
without considering connecting to the internet.  No need to rehash that
here.  Let's just hope for the best.

My last comment to the list.

//Jack

Date sent:              Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:14:26 -0700
Send reply to:          Gnarlodious <gnarlodious@EARTHLINK.NET>
From:                   Gnarlodious <gnarlodious@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject:                Re: Largest diameter... failures in politics.
To:                     vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM

> Entity Jack spoke thus:
>
> > Be very careful!  The principal (Bev Harris) in blackboxvoting.org is
> > hardly non-partisan.  //jack
> In my observation she is nonpartisan. Her campaign is against the big 3
> corporations that make and manage the voting machines. She promotes no
> agenda regarding political issues other than that.
> It just so happens that "The Big 3" have close ties to the Bush
> administration, maybe that's the "partisanship" you should be looking at.
>
> -- Gnarlie
>
>
> >> non-partisan posting....
> >>
> >> http://www.blackboxvoting.org/?q=node/view/78#breaking
> >>
> >> sorry, this was kind of alarming.
> >>
> >> if you are in a state with electronic voting, make sure that you ask
> >> the pollsters if they've been made aware of this issue.
> >>
> >> remember to vote today. it's your civic duty.
> >>
> >> please- no partisan posts or replies.
> >>
> >> that is all.