

| Subject: | Re: Will nonpower-steer swaybars & hubs fit power-steer stubs? |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Nov 2004 23:26:05 +1300 |
>By stubs he means knuckles. PS knuckles have the holes for the tie rod >connection bored closer to the c/line of the ball joints. Same forging, >I think. >Al Brase > >BenT Syncro wrote: > >>On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 13:46:14 +1300, Andrew Grebneff >><andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> wrote: >> >>>I have Whiteline swaybars and have ordered Porsche brake conversion >>>kit for my 84 with no power steering. I have a powered rack to fit, >>>and would prefer to fit stubaxles from a power-steered van so that >>>steeringwheel turns are reduced. >>> >>>I have the opportunity to get stubs & radius rods from someone moving >>>from England to NZ. >>> >>>Will swaybars and brakes from a nonpowered van fit power-steer stubs? >>>-- >>>Andrew Grebneff >>> >> >>Andrew, >> >>What do you mean by "power-steer stubs"? Is your brake conversion kit >>designed to fit the earlier steering knuckle (AKA suspension >>uprights)? The mounting holes and system for the calipers will be >>different when comparing your 84 to the 86 -later vans. >> >>BenT >>BenT Stubaxle carriers, knuckes, whatever. The part to which the caliper brackets, wheelbearings and steering balljoints fit. If the pitman arm length is the only difference, then I'm OK. But I have a feeling the early type is not interchangable with the later, as BenT points out. -- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin New Zealand Fossil preparator <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »