

| Subject: | Re: LMMU was: mass air flow sensor adapted to a vanagon |
| From: | Al and Sue Brase |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Nov 2004 13:40:35 -0600 |
Jim: Jee, if you spell it out, you've gotta change to the Deutsch keyboard layout to get the umlaut! I only mentioned the Volvo setup because I figured it might speak a language that was a bit closer to the stock Digifant. I realize that is nearly 20 year old technology now. (In fact, I talked to Bosch guys clear back in about 1985 when I was putting a big bore kit on an FI equipped 1978 type 2. They were all excited about the new "hot wire technology" back then. I'm sure there are a great many improvments out there. (I know nearly NOTHING about other brands!) Looks promising! Put me on your list if you want beta testing on a ver stock 1991! Al Brase Bostig Engineering wrote: >Hi all, > >I figure I should chime in quickly and give a synopsis of what we're about >to release. It is a comlpete intake/air meter replacement kit, not just a >mass air convertor box(as someone pointed out is commercially available). >It plumbs into the stock snorkel, and replaces the stock airbox/meter. It >is completely plug and play (two harnesses, and snaps into the stock >airbox retainer locations) and can be installed and working in a few >minutes. It is also specifically designed for the 2.1, and comes with the >correct base fuel curve translation. The base unit allows control of the >curve via a three button panel and display, and for those with tired >engines, or indeed with exhaust or other upgrades, the unit will allow you >to adjust the effective base fuel curve and allow the VW ecu to trim >correctly if it's been bumped out of range. The learning unit will take >the signal from a wideband 02, and through a suggested "learning mode" set >of driving conditions we provide, can set itself up in about 30-45 >minutes(after which you return the wideband to us). This has the advantage >of allowing an extremely accurate base tune, specific to the owners >vehicle etc, without requiring the owner to spend time learning how to >tune. > >Converting to mass air isn't rocket science, as someone else points out, >but to really do it correctly takes quite a bit of care, and attention to >detail. For example to isolate the meter electrically so it reads >accurately and consistently down to system voltages below 11 for use on >older vehicles with weak electrical systems, and to program electronic >throttle tip-in detection to help compensate for the almost instantaneous >jump to lean on rapid throttle openings, making it fully plug and play >with the existing system (no need to cut/splice anything). Everything down >to choosing a good meter that can help avoid incorrect readings due to >intake pulse exaggerations(the bosch meter someone mentioned would not >have been a good candidate for example), that is also durable, available, >correctly sized and reasonably priced etc. > >The exciting thing about the kit is it's performance. We're all eagerly >awaiting our trip to the dyno, as by the seat-of-the-pants-O'meter, it is >doing quite well. After having seen the potential gains to be had by >flowing the stock intake (the ford meter flows better than 250% of the >vanagon meter), and seeing the need to be able to tune in many cases, and >indeed after having watched the attempts to "tune" via spring pressure in >the stock meter... and after having seen air meters not perform due to >dirty contacts, and afer having read about folks with massive power loss >at altitude (the mass air conversion kit should fix this problem, please >contact me if you live at altitude and would like to be a beta tester) we >figured it was time to offer something. > >In any case, we're putting together all of our information now, and will >have results and data for all to see as soon as we can! In the meantime, >we'd love to find some additional Boston area beta testers to help us in >the final stages of developement. As Bob pointed out, the equivalent >pressure drop of the stock VW intake at 5200 RPM vs. our setup is >equivalent to about 1 PSI, which if you understand engines, is quite >substantial. I'd hate to promise more power, more torque, tunability, >reliability, and fuel economy all in the same product, but I'm afraid I >might have to soon. But as I said, we'll let the numbers speak for >themselves. Feel free to email me off list with any questions or if you >are interested. I don't believe that we are going to "pre-sell" anything, >as I hate the practice, but beta testers will get priority on the first >production units naturally. We believe the kit will be called the LMMU >(Luftmassenmesser Umr�stsatz). > >Thanks for reading and keep 'em rolling, > >Jim Akiba >Bostig Engineering > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »