

| Subject: | Re: WBX in Porsche |
| From: | Stan Wilder |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:35:44 -0600 |
The 914 / 912e have a lot to do with gear boxes. I only turn 3300 RPMS at 80+ mph in my 912e. Remember to get the gearbox that will keep your conversion alive. The little 914/912e aircooled engines don't have low end torque to move a heavy vanagon. They do however have high end torque but still only 87 HP in the 3000 to 4500 rrm range. Stan Wilder Engine Ceramics 214-352-4931 www.engineceramics.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al and Sue Brase" <albeeee@MCHSI.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 6:48 PM Subject: WBX in Porsche > Just a damn minute here! I've been listening to all this bile about > WBXers for the last six years, with the occasional message of hope from > Bob Donalds, Robert Lilley and a few others. I myself managed to ruin > a rod bearing in one after doing an incredible stupid thing. Yet after > bringing that one back from the dead, I've had almost completely > positive experiences with them. Almost completely "set and forget" > positive. Only one fuel pressure regulator, 2 O2 sensors, maybe 3 water > pumps in probably 300k miles since 1990. Oh, quite a few water pipes, > exhaust pipes, mufflers, but I live in the heart of the rust belt and > these cars never get inside during the winter. > So good, in fact, that I have entertained that very idea of putting one > in a Porsche.. (Not a 911. I love 911 motors- everybody should have one > sometime- but in a 912. My original idea was to put a 912E engine in a > 67 912 Targa that I have buried in my shop and even bought the engine > and all the parts to do it. but now, I think how superior this WBX is to > the old type 4 motor. Quiet, Reliable, powerful, thrifty. If I could > figure out how to put in a radiator and heater without wrecking the car, > I'd do it. Stock, a 2.1 WBX is about the same as a 912 engine at 95 hp. > I think a very slight cam regrind and a chip might move it up to the > range where it would be somewhat more powerful than the stock 912 engine. > Al Brase > anyone want a nice 912E motor? > > Stan Wilder wrote: > > ><snip> > > > >A fellow in my local Porsche club is installing a WBX 2.1 into his 78 911 > >that blew an $8000.00 engine. > >I haven't made a single comment to him about his conversion but I've got to > >hand it to him, he's figured both that hardest job possible and the worst > >engine possible for his resurrection project. > >The upside to his conversion is that he'll never have enough power to break > >his tranny. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.3 - Release Date: 11/26/2004 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.3 - Release Date: 11/26/2004
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »