Tabe, Chris, and Volks,

I would guess that Tabe doesn't have kids (know that Chris doesn't) as
much of the stuff in his post if far beyond PG-14.  There are far too
many pictures of a woman's virtually nude rear end, many of the photo
edited ones being in very suggestive positions, for it to be PG-14.
However, further on down the threaded emails are links to sites, well at
least two, but there were more links I didn't follow, with totally nude
women engaging in explicit sexual acts, along with links to sites with
sexually oriented names, material totally inappropriate for this list,
even on Friday.

I imagine that the odds that my 15 year old has seen some porn on the
internet are very high, but I don't want him to be led straight to it by
following Fryday Funnies on the Vanagon list.

In addition and equally important, this material is offensive to many of
the adults on the list, and is not what they signed onto the list to
receive.  I am sure there are lists that some of you can join where this
material is the focus of the discussion.

Tom, if people are going to get monitored for 30 days for a flaunting a
bath room word, a decision with which I agree, then what is appropriate
for the posting and reposting of this link?  60 days?  90 days?

Sam

--
Sam Walters
Baltimore, MD

89 Syncro GL
85 Westy Weekender

All incoming and outgoing email scanned by
automatically updated copy of Norton AntiVirus.