Hi Sam,

I'm sorry you were disturbed by the content of the link.  I do
have a child, though I am not totally up to date on the film
rating system.

I will be more careful about the links I forward to the list in
the future.

Apologies,

--tabe

 --- Sam Walters <sam.cooks@verizon.net> wrote:
> Tabe, Chris, and Volks,
>
> I would guess that Tabe doesn't have kids (know that Chris doesn't) as
> much of the stuff in his post if far beyond PG-14.  There are far too
> many pictures of a woman's virtually nude rear end, many of the photo
> edited ones being in very suggestive positions, for it to be PG-14.
> However, further on down the threaded emails are links to sites, well at
> least two, but there were more links I didn't follow, with totally nude
> women engaging in explicit sexual acts, along with links to sites with
> sexually oriented names, material totally inappropriate for this list,
> even on Friday.
>
> I imagine that the odds that my 15 year old has seen some porn on the
> internet are very high, but I don't want him to be led straight to it by
> following Fryday Funnies on the Vanagon list.
>
> In addition and equally important, this material is offensive to many of
> the adults on the list, and is not what they signed onto the list to
> receive.  I am sure there are lists that some of you can join where this
> material is the focus of the discussion.
>
> Tom, if people are going to get monitored for 30 days for a flaunting a
> bath room word, a decision with which I agree, then what is appropriate
> for the posting and reposting of this link?  60 days?  90 days?
>
> Sam
>
>
> --
> Sam Walters
> Baltimore, MD
>
> 89 Syncro GL
> 85 Westy Weekender

______________________________________________________________________
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca