

| Subject: | Re: High ratio rocker arms - Any good? |
| From: | Eric Zeno |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:19:11 -0500 |
"My main concern is if they are any good, why didn't VW
include them from the factory? "
These are clearly words of wisdom. With every mod. there is
give and take.
With this change I would geuss you are shifting the HP to a higher RPM
range,
witch means less torque. Also the likely hood is higher rpm's = less life
out of the engine. CLearly more valve train where. NOthing is fro free.
Eric
tabe johnson wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>High ratio rocker arms, up to 1.4:1 I believe, are available
>for our vehicles. Do they improve performance? Do they
>contribute to excessive valve, valve seat, or valve train
>wear? If you have them or have used them, I'd be really
>interested to hear your experiences.
>
>My main concern is if they are any good, why didn't VW
>include them from the factory? It can't cost any more
>to make 1.4:1 rocker arms than 1.1:1. (Unless they used
>the same mould they built in 1960, which wouldn't surprise
>me.)
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>--tabe johnson
>xtabe@yahoo.com
>'87 Westy
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
>
>
>
>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »