On 12/3/04 10:19 AM, "Eric Zeno" <vw4x4@FYI.NET> wrote:

> "My main concern is if they are any good, why didn't VW
> include them from the factory? "
> 
>       These are clearly words of wisdom.  With every mod. there is
> give and take.
> With this change I would geuss you are shifting the HP to a higher RPM
> range,
> witch means less torque.  Also the likely hood is higher rpm's = less life
> out of the engine. CLearly more valve train where.  NOthing is fro free.
>                                                                Eric
> 
> 
> 
> tabe johnson wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> High ratio rocker arms, up to 1.4:1 I believe, are available
>> for our vehicles.  Do they improve performance?  Do they
>> contribute to excessive valve, valve seat, or valve train
>> wear?  If you have them or have used them, I'd be really
>> interested to hear your experiences.
>> 
>> My main concern is if they are any good, why didn't VW
>> include them from the factory?  It can't cost any more
>> to make 1.4:1 rocker arms than 1.1:1.  (Unless they used
>> the same mould they built in 1960, which wouldn't surprise
>> me.)
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> --tabe johnson
>> xtabe@yahoo.com
>> '87 Westy
>> 
Used those on my bug engines.  The effect was fine with the bug and did have
a noticable performance change.  However when they were added to a bay bus
with the older 1600 engine they had no effect at all.  I would say that with
the even heavier mass of the vanagon that the effect would also be nil
except that there is a higher wear associated with their use on the valve
train.

For the vanagon you would be better off with big valve heads and a proper
cam for them.
 

����������������������������������������
jimt
Planned insanity is best.
Remember that sanity is optional.
http://www.tactical-bus.info (tech info)
http://www.westydriver.com