

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon name |
| From: | pete or nancy owsianowski |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:26:05 -0500 |
There is a book called "Brooklands Road Test" for the Volkswagen Bus Camper Van 1979-1989. Has an South African road test article on page 21 comparing the Datsun Ekonawagen, the Mitsubishi Center L300, the Toyota Hi-Ace and the Vanagon in detail. Pete '87 Westy "Joe's Van" >>> That's the Liteace, the small toyota van which first appeared in the >>> latest 60s or possibly realiest 70s. >> >> Wasn't the Liteace/Van Wagon introduced in 1979? I mean, look at it. It's >> NOT a late 60's Japanese design! > > NO. It was introduced for one model cycle in the US. The first > Liteace was sold in the late 60s or by 1973 at latest... there are > still lots of that model on the road in Fiji, for instance (no, I > don't have images). They first appeared in NZ in the 1978 generation, > and have been sold here since. It was a truly evolutionary design; > the second-generation was, like VW's Bay, a heavy facelift of the > first generation, and retained that van's floorpan and side panels. > >>> That thing Toyota built was a piece of junk in the design world. >>> Way to small. engine between the seat was terrible. But the price >>> was right, so they sold them. >>> Eric >>> >> >> You are kidding aren't you Eric? >> >> Anybody driving a Vanagon calling any Toyota a piece of junk has his mindset >> is some other world. Anybody driving a stock Vanagon calling any other >> engine setup TOO small has got to find reality in some other universe. >> >> I love my Vanagon, but rely on it for everyday transportation? Hats off to >> anyone who does but I'll take a Toyota anything for everyday transportation. >> >> It's like I told my Dad when he was thinking about replacing the Jetta my >> mother wrecked. I asked him if, at the age of 68, did he want to work on it >> or drive it. He bought the Camry. 7 years later, it's still going with >> little or no maintenance. >> >> tim in san jose > > >> To start at the end, not even the Toyota brand would continue to sell a >> model for 25 years just because the price is right, nobody buys junk today >> ( exept Vanagonees ;-)) >> The engine that sits between the seats are a really nice piece of machinery, >> and even though working on it through the mailbox opening is a bit awkward >> and often limits the maintenance they start and run every time you want >> them to >> The size of the car- well, it has to fit your ego as well as your butt but >> still, after 25 years of sale they seems to fit the needs of a whole lot of >> peoples > > Right-on, Tim and Calle. This van IS small, but that suits a lot of > owners, including lotsa businesses. The US missed out on the VW-sized > Hiace (similar layout to the Liteace, but more body variants)... ask > Toyota USA why. For various reasons it's the best van made anywhere, > and almost anywhere outside northern North America is present in > large numbers. > >> In 1990 my wife bought an Acura Legend and I bought a vanagon. The >> Acura has about 130K miles on it, and it's on its third engine. The VW >> has 190K miles on it and the engine's never been opened. >> >> I haven't driven anything but a diesel westy or a gas Carat for the >> last 14 years. I'm sure there are many others on the list who have done >> many more Vanagon miles than I have. >> >> So what's the hats off for? > > Not to Honda... which makes nice-looking cars which are extremely > rust-prone (even in unsalted areas) and engines which are perhaps > delicate (qualification: but it makes the best motorcycles). I find > Hondas' controls unergonomic too. But Hondas ain't Toyotas. > > > -- > Andrew Grebneff > Dunedin > New Zealand > Fossil preparator > <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> > Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »