

| Subject: | Re: Jackin' Up The Van |
| From: | Al and Sue Brase |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:40:21 -0600 |
Stan: You need to chill out and start driving like a grown up.Either that or maybe it's the heat of the air cooled plus Texas! I've had 4 wbxers, 1 air cooled, longest for 14 years. total of 2 broken mounts out of 20 possible positions. Both on the air cooled. Not that I have been that easy on them. Al Brase Stan Wilder wrote: >I replaced about 12 rear motor mounts on my 82 Westy in ten years of >ownership. >Some came from list vendors and some came from local VW Parts store. >Spinning the rear wheels in wet weather or on icy streets is about the best >way to tear them out. > >Stan Wilder >Engine Ceramics >214-352-4931 >www.engineceramics.com > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Robert Fisher" <refisher@MCHSI.COM> >To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:36 PM >Subject: Re: Jackin' Up The Van > > > > >>When I bought my van it had three broken motor mounts. Oddly enough, it >>didn't seem to be affecting it much, but when I bought the full set to >>replace them, the guy that owns the import repair/parts place I use told >> >> >me > > >>that just about every Vgon he'd worked on had at least two broken mounts >>(the driver's side, IIRC). This guy is a VW specialist and owner from way >>back. It was his theory that the mounts were typically under-designed and >>that the torque of the flat four was too much for them over time. I've >> >> >kept > > >>an eye out for some sign of this since I've been on the list and haven't >>seen much mention of it. For that matter, they're pretty well buried down >>there and if broken mounts don't have any more effect in general than they >>did on mine, that might explain it. My point is, anyway, that if this is >> >> >as > > >>common as my guy thinks it is, it would make it just that much more >>dangerous to lift the van by the engine, risking a sudden collapse. >> >>As for myself, I wouldn't lift any vehicle by any mounts, or anything else >>that wasn't part of the frame or so well attached to it as to make no >>difference. My exception to this, I guess would be jacking from under the >>wheel arms, which are of course designed to support at least part of the >>weight of the vehicle. >> >>I have to jack the van up pretty high to make room for myself under there, >>and I've always used the engine crossbar when I wanted to lift the entire >>rear. I've done this more times than I ever wanted to and it hasn't >>distorted the bar at all. I just take it slow and easy when I lift it. I >> >> >use > > >>a bottle jack (sometimes with wood pieces) to move or support the engine >> >> >or > > >>tranny as needed once I have the jack stands in. >> >>If I'm feeling especially paranoid on taking a trip, I take a floor jack >> >> >(I > > >>have a large one and a small one) and two jacks stands, again mostly >> >> >because > > >>I have to get plenty of clearance to get under a vehicle safely. Never >>really had too much of a space issue, as I try to travel light (my wife's >>efforts at 'packing' notwithstanding). Under more 'normal' (mental) >>circumstances, I just take the bottle jack in its case. Worked for me so >>far... >> >>Cya, >>Robert >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Greg Potts" <Greg@POTTSFAMILY.CA> >>To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >>Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 4:37 PM >>Subject: Re: Jackin' Up The Van >> >> >>Hi Al, >> >>4 of those rubber mounts would *probably* be plenty strong enough to >>raise a vanagon. I know I have seen a bay raised without tearing them, >>but only when they were fresh. I've seen stale mounts tear firsthand... >>having a ton of bus shift on the jack is very dangerous. >> >>Happy trails, >> >>Greg Potts >>Toronto, Ontario, Canada >> >>1973/74/79 Westfakia Conversion **Bob the Tomato** LY3H >>1977 Sunroof Automatic L63H/L90D >>http://www.pottsfamily.ca/westfakia >>http://www.busesofthecorn.com >> >> >>On 29-Dec-04, at 1:49 PM, Al and Sue Brase wrote: >> >> >> >>>Actually, there are 4 rubber mounts there and each bigger than the old >>>type 4 mounts. Waterboxers use the same parts. >>>You guys are right, but that's the way I always do it. WAY easier. I >>>just put a 2x4 on top of the jack and lift in the middle of the engine. >>>Right where the strainer would be if it were a Type 1 engine. >>>If they break, it is time to fix them. I've never had one break. BUT, >>>I'd never forget that it could happen, resulting in sudden unintended >>>downward acceleration of the vehicle. That's what jack stands are for. I >>>put the jackstands on the outriggers ahead of the rear wheels, then I >>>lower the jack slowly to put MOST of the weight on the jackstands. >>>I then take a hammer and whack each stand to make sure all 4 legs are on >>>the ground. Then I let the rest of the weght off the jack, but leave it >>>right there. I then push as hard as I can on each corner. If it falls >>>now, the jack will catch it. And I don't want any surprises while I'm >>>underneath. (It seems like nearly every year, I hear on the local news >>>of some amatuer mechanic crushed to death under his car- I don't love my >>>Vanagons THAT much!) >>>Al >>> >>>Greg Potts wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi Craig, >>>> >>>>I can't speak directly for the waterboxer (The seller now has the >>>>title, and we should have it here in Toronto in 7-10 days) but I can >>>>say that the 68-83.5 aircooled buses should NEVER be lifted by the >>>>engine. >>>> >>>>In an aircooled bus or Vanagon the engine is connected to the yoke by >>>>two rubber motor mounts that will tear if they're asked to support the >>>>weight of the vehicle. >>>> >>>>I usually lift by the engine yoke, or by putting the jack under a >>>>frame member. NOT from the engine. >>>> >>>>Happy trails, >>>> >>>>Greg Potts >>>>Toronto, Ontario, Canada >>>> >>>>1973/74/79 Westfakia Conversion **Bob the Tomato** LY3H >>>>1977 Sunroof Automatic L63H/L90D >>>>http://www.pottsfamily.ca/westfakia >>>>http://www.busesofthecorn.com >>>> >>>> >>>>On 29-Dec-04, at 12:07 PM, Craig Oda wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Isn't is possible to jack the van up by putting the jack plate under >>>>>the engine block. I think this is what the "101 projects for your >>>>>porsche" book recommends. It says to put a piece of wood or something >>>>>under the engine block to avoid scratching it. Any thoughts on why >>>>>this wouldn't work on a vanagon? >>>>> >>>>>-- Craig >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:16:32 -0600, Stan Wilder >>>>><wilden1-1@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>I've lifted mine many times from the steel engine yoke that the rear >>>>>>motor >>>>>>mounts screw to. >>>>>>I've never bent one doing it this way but you could also lift from >>>>>>the point >>>>>>that the tranny mounts to the front crossbar. I've done this too but >>>>>> >>>>>> >it > > >>>>>>seems to be about a balancing point and not as stable as the rear >>>>>> >>>>>> >lift > > >>>>>>scenario. >>>>>> >>>>>>Stan Wilder >>>>>>Engine Ceramics >>>>>>214-352-4931 >>>>>>www.engineceramics.com >>>>>>----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>From: "Dave Chameides" <docproteus@EARTHLINK.NET> >>>>>>To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:56 PM >>>>>>Subject: Jackin' Up The Van >>>>>> >>>>>>If I have a floor jack and want to raise the van from the center rear >>>>>>without doing one side and then the other (I don�t want it to tip >>>>>>side to >>>>>>side right now) is there a center point that is strong enough to be >>>>>>a jack >>>>>>point (keeping in mind that as soon as I get the butt up in the air, >>>>>>I�ll be >>>>>>jack standing the leafs and letting it rest back down on them). >>>>>>Will the >>>>>>transmission hold the weight? >>>>>> >>>>>>Dave >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>-- >>>>>>No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>>>>>Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 12/28/2004 >>>>>> >>>>>>-- >>>>>>No virus found in this outgoing message. >>>>>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>>>>>Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 12/28/2004 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>-- >>No virus found in this incoming message. >>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 12/28/2004 >> >> >> >> > > > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 12/28/2004 > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »