

| Subject: | Re: Electrical pollution? |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 09:26:13 -0600 |
JimT, Thanks for the rebuttal. I did not expect anything less. Best regards, John Rodgers 88 GL driver jimt wrote: >On 1/9/05 12:31 AM, "two.tone.tool.box" <kite.wagon@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > > >>I'm sorry John but... why?? I cannot let that BS about Mexican >>"Hoards" and "rats eating all the grain" go unchallenged (I know i >>shouldnt, sorry everyone else in advance). Your racist, over the top >>generalizations have nothing to do with your vanagon, my vanagon or >>this list, or the future powering of the global economy. First of >>all, its not resources that immigrants come for, as you claim, its >>_jobs_. Thats why Europe is all also "browning" to use your crude >>terminology, even though the Isles and the Continent have a lot less >>natural resources per person than this country. Mexico and South >>America are resource rich. >> >> > > >Normally I would remain silent on this type of issue but straight facts. > >Here in colorado our electrical rates are up to pay for the dismantling of a >nuclear power facility that was not sustainable or repairable to meet >current standards. The increase in rates is already forecasted to far >exceed the savings from the nuclear power that was derived from it. The >power company must pay its share of putting the highly reactive parts into >deep storage and all costs associated with getting it there. Cheap nuclear >power is proving to be very expensive. Look at three mile island with a >reactor that is costing money as it sits dead because of maintenance and >inspections to make sure it stays sealed. As yet europe has not had to >decommission a reactor and has publicly stated it doesn�t know how it will >be handled. Then it is already known that the french government has been >dumping in the oceans trenches in the deep pacific. When nuclear power was >brought on line it was thought that technology would have found a way to >deal with the waste by the time there was any to dispose of. Disposal costs >took the cheap out and created massive risks. > >As for migrations of populations...look right here in this country. Massive >migration from california to colorado by tech firms that could no longer >afford to have their businesses in california. That fast rapid influx has >stretched colorados water resources and air quality to its limits. The so >called "browning effect" (as it may even apply to my exwife and children) >has no effect on this state. The corporate migration moved million plus. >International migrants moved very little in effect. Also the international >migrants pay taxes. The corporate migrants are leaches on the economy with >their massive tax deductions for making the moves. > >���������������������������������������� >jimt >Planned insanity is best. >Remember that sanity is optional. >http://www.tactical-bus.info (tech info) >http://www.westydriver.com > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »