

| Subject: | 2.1 to 1.9 oil cooler retrofit design Q (longish) |
| From: | Damon Campbell |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:15:49 -0800 |
Hello List, My 2.3 engine uses the simpler 1.9 cooling system, which i like for simplicity, but i dislike for the lack of an oil cooler. So on to thinking about how to use the 2.1 oil cooler that is already installed in the engine (just not hooked up to any coolant). Talking to my dad about this, we came up with 2 possible scenarios: 1) essentially go from the coolant crossover pipe to the oil cooler, and then back up to the expansion tank. Another way to go about this would be to go directly from the return hose of the rear heater core around the engine bay to the oil cooler, and then back up to the expansion tank. This might effectively eliminate the crossover pipe altogether. 2) install an auto tranny coolant bleeder H-pipe (the one mounted to the fire wall that the radiator hoses hook up to), and hook up to the oil cooler that way (basically replacing what would have been a tranny cooler with the oil cooler). There are pros and cons to each. Pro for #1 is that it runs off the engine coolant loop, so it will help heat up the oil on cold startups, much like the 2.1 system does. Con for #1 is that there will be a noticeable change in hose diameter between the crossover pipe and the oil cooler, and another big change from the cooler to the expansion tank. I'm concerned about flow restrictions and the like. It would also likely be quite a bit of fabrication. Pro for #2 is that it is pretty close to a factory design, and would be relatively easy to plumb in (assuming hose diameters for oil and tranny coolers are pretty compatible - are they?). This would also replace one of the original (21 year old!) hard pieces in the coolant system. Con would be that it runs off the radiator loop. Additionally, I don't even know if this setup would provide enough flow to adequately cool the oil (would it?). I know this is a bit lengthy, but would either of these ideas work, and if so, which would be better. Is there something else that would be preferable altogether? I am, however, leaning to design #2. Thanks, and i appreciate any input you may have on the subject. -Damon ===== '84 Westy (Sparky) w/2.3L WBX Vancouver, BC __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »