Yes Jeffrey! Even Ray Charles could see that.
Yes R12 is approximately 14% more efficient than 134.
Auto-makers response to this was simply to spin the compressor faster to
compensate and build a substantial compressor business in the process.
Just consider that a recharge of R12 cost about $215.00 on my Crown Vic last
year.
Next year it could easily be in the $400.00 range.
You better consider your future needs and just roll on over to the cheaper
stuff before you regret the wait.

Stan Wilder
Engine Ceramics
214-352-4931
www.engineceramics.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Schwaia" <jeff@VANAGONPARTS.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: 134 conversion

> Same O, Same O, Except....
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the Vanagon interior is a wee bit
> bigger than a 912.  I could be wrong, perhaps I forgot to carry the one.
>
> Ceteris Paribus, R-12 is more efficient than R-134.
>
> Happy cooling...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
> www.vanagonparts.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM]On Behalf
> Of Stan Wilder
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:07 PM
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> Subject: Re: 134 conversion
>
>
> Same Type IV engine, Same Mini Your Compressor, Same general application
> Suction Valve and Reciever dryer. Same O Same O.
> And another Port Of Entry or Dealer Installed system.
> If this was a $300.00 midification I wouldn't encourage it but it cam be
> accomplished for less that the R12 refrigerant charge.
> I was quoted $175.00 to recharge my Porsche system with R12 and that is
> about the same as the VW system.
>
> Stan Wilder
> Engine Ceramics
> 214-352-4931
> www.engineceramics.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "TJ Hannink" <tjhannink@YAHOO.COM>
> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:46 PM
> Subject: Re: 134 conversion
>
>
> > Stan Wilder <wilden1-1@SBCGLOBAL.NET> wrote:
> >
> > > So when some body says something, remember to ask: "Have you ever done
> > > that?" and that should send you in the right direction.
> >
> > So have you ever modified the A/C on a Vanagon this way? Your posts in
the
> archives describe your success in doing this to a 912e Porsche, not a
> Vanagon; thats a little like comparing apples to oranges.
> >
> > There is at least one post in the archives from someone who has done
this
> modification to a Vanagon and for them it didn't seem to make any
> difference.
> >
> > Good luck,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > TJ Hannink
> > Goldibox - 1987 Vanagon Camper, Wolfsburg Edition
> > 1981 Bluebird Wanderlodge, FC-33
> > Winter Park, Florida
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~tjhannink/
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wolfsburg_campers
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wanderlodge
> > FAVOR website:  http://home.earthlink.net/~clubvanagon
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> >  Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005
>
>

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005