

| Subject: | Re: 134 conversion |
| From: | Stan Wilder |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:29:43 -0600 |
That is state controlled. Normally handled by those that sell R12 refrigerants. From what I understand its about a three day school to learn how to properly use the recovery equipment and the safety factors in pre-diagnosing the contents of a system so you don't blow up your shop with Butane that is sometimers used in Auto A/C systems by crooks. Without the recovery and installation system the license won't be of much use to you. http://www.ntxtools.com/Merchant/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=ROB-17800B&Category_Code=ROB There are less expensive systems. I've seen similar systems for about $1400.00 Stan Wilder Engine Ceramics 214-352-4931 www.engineceramics.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Rodgers" <inua@CHARTER.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:10 PM Subject: Re: 134 conversion > Stan, where does one go to see about this license thing??? > > I'm getting ready to completely reqork my AC system. Being able to do it > completely myself would be great. > > Thanks, > > John Rodgers > 88 GL Driver > > Stan Wilder wrote: > > >It doesn't actually equal regreting the wait it's simply that Vanagon folks > >are often tightly wound folks that will not spend the necessary money for > >new hoses and other new parts that the system would need before repairing a > >system for R12 after 15 to 25 years of use. > > > >So if you're not going to go the full routine of hose replacement, > >compressor seals, expansion valve and new dryer I would suggest that the 134 > >would be a cheaper solution than the R12 recharge. > > > >If you will take your R12 license and calculate the actual first class > >repair of a leaky or non functioning Vanagon system you'll probably find it > >would run over $400.00 to recharge a system with the required seals, hoses, > >dryers etc before you'd give a custyomer a guarantee. > > > >My hose set was $227.00, Compressor Seal $18.00, Dryer $28.00, Expansion > >Valve $30.00, 134R $15.00, Extra condenser I'll call $25.00 but it was free > >because I alread had it. Then the shop labor, Oh! I did that myself and > >saved $350.00. > > > >As for Hap-Hazzard conversions there are many sites that run through the > >full routine and most women that get out of High School could do the job if > >they read the instructions. > > > >Stan Wilder > >Engine Ceramics > >214-352-4931 > >www.engineceramics.com > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Jeffrey Schwaia" <jeff@VANAGONPARTS.COM> > >To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > >Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 5:47 PM > >Subject: Re: 134 conversion > > > > > > > > > >>Thank you for your "suggestion" that I consider my future needs, however, > >>why should I act now? Is R-134a about to skyrocket in price? Perhaps the > >>purchase of R-134a is akin to Microschmeg stock in 1985? > >> > >> > >>My Point of View: > >> > >>The price of R-12 has been pretty static at $22 a can, R-134a is about $5 > >> > >> > >a > > > > > >>can. A Vanagon takes 3.5 cans of refrigerant, let's say $100 of R-12 to > >>make the math easy. Now, considering my first statement about the A/C > >>system, "good & tight, with no leaks", IMO it is by far the smarter path > >> > >> > >to > > > > > >>keep the system stock spend the extra $80 and use R-12. > >> > >>I have worked on several vans that had been converted to R-134a where the > >>owner installed a high efficiency condenser and not one of them cooled as > >>well as a good working stock R-12 system. Hap-hazard R-134a conversions > >>often do more damage than good due to the fact that these systems were not > >>designed for R-134a (e.g., the conversion has to be done right). > >> > >>Yes, I am a licensed A/C tech (big whoop), and my shop does have an R-12 > >>recovery machine, however, R-12 is not that hard to get. The A/C tech > >> > >> > >tests > > > > > >>are available online, they're cheap and are a joke. Once you have your > >> > >> > >EPA > > > > > >>number, you can buy R-12. > >> > >> > >>Ah, I love A/C topics. So many opinions, such little actual experience... > >> > >>Cheers, > >> > >>Jeff > >>www.vanagonparts.com > >> > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM]On Behalf > >>Of Stan Wilder > >>Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:19 PM > >>To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > >>Subject: Re: 134 conversion > >> > >> > >>Yes Jeffrey! Even Ray Charles could see that. > >>Yes R12 is approximately 14% more efficient than 134. > >>Auto-makers response to this was simply to spin the compressor faster to > >>compensate and build a substantial compressor business in the process. > >>Just consider that a recharge of R12 cost about $215.00 on my Crown Vic > >> > >> > >last > > > > > >>year. > >>Next year it could easily be in the $400.00 range. > >>You better consider your future needs and just roll on over to the cheaper > >>stuff before you regret the wait. > >> > >>Stan Wilder > >>Engine Ceramics > >>214-352-4931 > >>www.engineceramics.com > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Jeffrey Schwaia" <jeff@VANAGONPARTS.COM> > >>To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > >>Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 4:50 PM > >>Subject: Re: 134 conversion > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>Same O, Same O, Except.... > >>> > >>>Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the Vanagon interior is a wee bit > >>>bigger than a 912. I could be wrong, perhaps I forgot to carry the one. > >>> > >>>Ceteris Paribus, R-12 is more efficient than R-134. > >>> > >>>Happy cooling... > >>> > >>>Cheers, > >>> > >>>Jeff > >>>www.vanagonparts.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM]On Behalf > >>>Of Stan Wilder > >>>Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:07 PM > >>>To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > >>>Subject: Re: 134 conversion > >>> > >>> > >>>Same Type IV engine, Same Mini Your Compressor, Same general application > >>>Suction Valve and Reciever dryer. Same O Same O. > >>>And another Port Of Entry or Dealer Installed system. > >>>If this was a $300.00 midification I wouldn't encourage it but it cam be > >>>accomplished for less that the R12 refrigerant charge. > >>>I was quoted $175.00 to recharge my Porsche system with R12 and that is > >>>about the same as the VW system. > >>> > >>>Stan Wilder > >>>Engine Ceramics > >>>214-352-4931 > >>>www.engineceramics.com > >>> > >>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>From: "TJ Hannink" <tjhannink@YAHOO.COM> > >>>To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > >>>Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:46 PM > >>>Subject: Re: 134 conversion > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Stan Wilder <wilden1-1@SBCGLOBAL.NET> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>So when some body says something, remember to ask: "Have you ever > >>>>> > >>>>> > >done > > > > > >>>>>that?" and that should send you in the right direction. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>So have you ever modified the A/C on a Vanagon this way? Your posts in > >>>> > >>>> > >>the > >> > >> > >>>archives describe your success in doing this to a 912e Porsche, not a > >>>Vanagon; thats a little like comparing apples to oranges. > >>> > >>> > >>>>There is at least one post in the archives from someone who has done > >>>> > >>>> > >>this > >> > >> > >>>modification to a Vanagon and for them it didn't seem to make any > >>>difference. > >>> > >>> > >>>>Good luck, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>TJ Hannink > >>>>Goldibox - 1987 Vanagon Camper, Wolfsburg Edition > >>>>1981 Bluebird Wanderlodge, FC-33 > >>>>Winter Park, Florida > >>>>http://home.earthlink.net/~tjhannink/ > >>>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wolfsburg_campers > >>>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wanderlodge > >>>>FAVOR website: http://home.earthlink.net/~clubvanagon > >>>> > >>>>--------------------------------- > >>>>Do you Yahoo!? > >>>> Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>No virus found in this incoming message. > >>>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >>>>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>-- > >>>No virus found in this outgoing message. > >>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >>>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005 > >>> > >>> > >>>-- > >>>No virus found in this incoming message. > >>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >>>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >>-- > >>No virus found in this outgoing message. > >>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005 > >> > >> > >>-- > >>No virus found in this incoming message. > >>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005 > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >No virus found in this outgoing message. > >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/2005
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »