

| Subject: | Re: JFF - re: Save the Adventurewagen Molds! (ultra long) |
| From: | Joe Federici |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:22:01 -0500 |
This is true but even before they rip off the design they change the name and that's the point I was making. It's not an adventurewagen (one word) it's just a high top. JFF On Feb 7, 2005, at 1:07 PM, Max Wellhouse wrote: Not familiar with the previous goings on about rights to use Adventure wagen name and all, but if the mold is changed 10%, there's not much the person owning the "rights" to the AW design can do in court. This happens to kayak designers all the time. Max At 10:20 AM 2/7/2005, Joe Federici wrote: > I would agree. . . I've had the option of having these molds for quite > some time and so have the members of the aw list on yahoo. Really it's > quite funny to me that Ed had been trying to sell them for next to > nothing for over a year. I posted about this I think twice to this and > most of the lists. At that time you could have worked out a deal for > the adventurewagen name with them. Now is desperation he gives them > away without any rights to the name and everyone has interest. I just > think for the amount of money and time whoever is going to put into > these molds 500.00 to pay him would have be nothing. Either way all I'm > looking for is the name and contact information for whoever Steve or > the body shop turns them over to. I don't see the point in debating it > on the list and wasting everyones time. That's not the point of this > list. > > I will as a friend of Ed's also be keeping an eye open to make sure the > new high tops will not be using the adventurewagen name as they are > not. This is no different then putting a westy top on a vanagon. > > JFF > > On Feb 7, 2005, at 4:03 AM, Robert Fisher wrote: > > Just up front and off the top of my head, I'm not sure the 'group's > approval' has any bearing here, just yet. That is, the molds belong to > somebody: They still belong to Ed, or he conveyed ownership to Steve, > or > someone else. It seems that Ed doesn't care and has probably bestowed > ownership on Steve, but I'm just speculating from earlier posts. Steve > doesn't want ownership, there's another Steven that does, there was > another > guy that already has a glass shop, and now there's you. > > I'm not sure any 'group consensus' has any meaning or bearing unless > Steve > or whoever has ownership wants to play it that way- like most things > it'll > probably come down to a personal deal being struck. Obviously there's > no > point in saving them if they're not going to be put in production, > which you > say you want to do and are capable of doing. You've obviously done some > homework and seem to have the desire, but that's a long way from being > able > to perform, as I'm sure you know. > > So, some additional thoughts/questions in general: > > Is the future owner going to actually have the time and inclination to > support and operate what is essentially a one-off, on-demand business > with a > low profit margin? This is probably the only real marketplace for these > tops. (?) > You wrote about possibly getting a local glass shop to do the actual > fabricating- is somebody really going to want to keep these things > around > and interrupt their normal business ops to make maybe 2-5 in a good > year? > Quality control? There's some artistry involved in this- how do you > know > when you're 'good'? > What can be done and what should be done about the window problem? > How to handle shipping? Installation? > What about the particulars such as headliners and the A/C ducting? How > are > these things obtained/reproduced? > What were the accessories required to install one of these tops and how > are > they obtained/reproduced? > Legalities- warranties, DOT requirements, etc. > > I'd like to see these things 'available', if nothing else, preferably > from > somebody that's a Vanagon enthusiast who will deal with the market (us) > in > good faith and with good service, as Jonathon says. Aside from that, I > couldn't say I have a preference if for no other reason than that I > don't > personally know a single one of you- except that it'd probably be a lot > cheaper for me if they stayed in California, assuming I can ever afford > one. > : ) > > Just some thoughts to add to the conversation; here's hoping they find > a > good home. > > Cya, > Robert
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »