

| Subject: | Re: 88 Vanagon thermostat question |
| From: | Dennis Haynes |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:44:46 -0500 |
The thermostat you removed with the 078 was not a Vanagon T-Stat. The lower disc is the wrong diameter and was probably sticking in the housing bore. That small bleeder in it is designed to ensure a small amount of coolant flow so the T-stat can sense when the water is getting warm. The Vanagon T-stat does not get this feature. In fact, the OEM T-stat even has a rubber seal on the top disc to ensure there is no bypass when closed. This is needed in cold weather the radiator and long coolant pipes have so much thermal reserve that even a small leakage will prevent the engine from warming up. Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of John Graham Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 11:26 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: 88 Vanagon thermostat question Over the weekend I changed out my thermostat as it just wasn't warming up very well in cold weather. The temp guage needle would seldom reach the mid point of the scale where it normally rides. When I removed the old thermostat, I realized that it had a little checkvalve feature on the outer ring - sorta like a little BB in a cage. The old thermostat had official VW and Audi stamps on it and a part number of 078 121 113F. I would guess that the mini checkvalve might have something to do with allowing air to escape the lower parts of the engine etc. Just guessing The new thermostat didn't have this checkvalve feature and had a part number of 025 121 113F. The box says it's made by Behr. Both thermostats were obtained from a reputable online vendor though several years apart. The new thermostat does seem to work better in keeping the engine temp up in the middle of the range, which is what I was after. I'm just curious as to whether it matters whether or not my thermostat has this little check valve Whatcha know? John Graham 88 Westy Charlotte NC
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »