

| Subject: | Re: 86 Vanagon for sale in SF $200 |
| From: | BenT Syncro |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:20:09 -0800 |
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:42:31 -0800, Robert Fisher <refisher@mchsi.com> wrote: > I was told recently by the CA DMV that the fees/penalties are now capped at > three years. > The DMV won't record your release of liability until they have registration > from a new owner or the salvage paperwork- this also according to the local > DMV office. Also, they may mention due fees on vehicles you have when you're > in there trying to do something else, but they won't hold a new registration > or what-have-you hostage to get the fees. There seems to be no enforcement > whatsoever as long as the car isn't on the road. <SNIP> Robert, I beg to difer. I hold three letters from the Franchise Tax Board on vehciles which was sold and a relaease of liability was filed. I had to refiule a copy before they acknowledged. One such vehicle I sold to Vic from Vanamania (who is in Las Vegas, Nevada). The insisted I refile the release of liability before releasing the impending lien on my assets for unpaid registration. On another deal, I sold a Scirocc and filed the release. When they asked for a refile, I did not have the buyer's license number. Within 60 days, they filed a lien with my bank and took the fees out of my bank account. I don't know how they handle enforcement in your area but they certainly seem to take a proactive stance in the cases I have been involved in. That Mike Miller should be able to answer these questions. He's a former DMV as-- h...informant... errr. bureaucrat. BenT
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »