

| Subject: | Re: Diesel Fuel vs. Gasoline |
| From: | Zoltan |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:14:21 -0700 |
Well said. Zolt�n ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Felder" <felder@KNOLOGY.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:42 PM Subject: Re: Diesel Fuel vs. Gasoline > Come on, now. Your 40% of small companies leaves sixty percent > comprising only a handful of international corporations who spend > millions, even billions to influence american (and other) politics. The > fact that they lobby with money year after year after year means that > it's working. They would quit doing it and try something else if they > didn't get their way through spending money and other influences. And > what other goal do you think they have in mind other than their bottom > lines, every quarter and every year? > > There may be a number of small companies who are helpless to make > policy, but I assure you they are benefiting from the business > environment created by those who are not helpless. Maybe if you were a > small company you didn't get to sit down with Dick Cheney in 2001 and > concoct our current energy policy behind closed doors, but the big guys > did. > > The american voters are misinformed on the energy issue and virtually > every other issue as well. They vote the way big money tells them to > vote. > > Being misinformed is far worse than being uninformed, because you have > so much to learn just to get to the level of stupid. > > Jim > > > > On Apr 27, 2005, at 5:12 PM, Aaron Pearson wrote: > >> i can think of several dozen privately held oil and gas companies off >> the top of my head that many people have probably never heard of. some >> have fewer than a dozen employees. independent oil comapnies produce >> 40% of the oil that americans consume. i'm sure many of them would >> love >> to be clever enough to conspire to fix prices, but the only reason they >> are making money is because of the open market. >> >> the boogeyman (boogeypeople?) are american voters, who are unable to >> vote for something that will cost money in the short term. i'm not >> against regulation at all, it's the only way we'll ever be able to move >> to alternative fuel- oil is still way too cheap. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gnarlodious [mailto:gnarlodious@EARTHLINK.NET] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:50 PM >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >> Subject: Re: Diesel Fuel vs. Gasoline >> >> >> Entity Aaron Pearson spoke thus: >> >>> of course profit drives the oil industry, it drives every industry in >>> a capitalist economy. there's no reason a company should charge any >>> less for its product than the maximum consumers are willing to spend. >> >> But what we are seeing now is the result of unrestrained consolidation, >> which at one time would have been prohibited under the Sherman >> Antitrust >> Act. >> >> Add this monopoly to the intentional sabotage of alternative fuel >> programs and it looks like we didn't learn the lesson of 1973. Those >> who >> are too young to remember can read or listen to Jimmy Carter's speech: >> http://americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jimmycartercrisisofconfidence.htm >> >> Of course, Ronald Reagan's (elected on Big Oil cash I might add) first >> official act as President was to remove the solar panels Jimmy Carter >> had put on top of the White House. >> >> I have heard those Libertarian (AKA Corporatist) talk radio wingnuts >> blame this on government overregulation, but it just ignores history. >> Their statements simply underscore their ultimate agenda of eliminating >> Government in all forms and handing our economy over to Corporations. >> >> The bottom line IMHO? It's virtually impossible to pricefix when the >> raw >> material is coming from corn and soybean farmers, windmill and solar >> farms and cottage industry refiners. >> >> -- Gnarlie >> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »