We've been down this path before.  Some will argue that the copyright
notice on the gerry.vanagon.com home page is binding. Others have
proved otherwise. I'm not an attorney though I do know a few socially.
I suspect that, copyright notice not withstanding, the information in
the archives of belongs to each individual author.

This whole discussion became one of vanagon.com's more sordid tales.
If you were here then you certainly do NOT want to go down this road
again.  Trust me.

Jim

On Monday, June 6, 2005, at 04:10 PM, Jorge Osorio wrote:

>
> PS2: Speaking of IP (Intellectual Property) Who would legally own the
> content of the archives? it is collective knowledge so? Question for
> all
> those eager lawyers lurking on the list ;-)
>
"We need a revolution."
"Keep saying that and we'll need a lawyer, assuming they let us have
one."

Jan Steinman <www.Bytesmiths.com>