

| Subject: | Re: Running without a cat |
| From: | Robert Cardo |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2005 22:14:32 -0500 |
The ticket for a non visual converter omission is to just knock out the stone, and bolt it back up. Contrary to the posting below the Van will breath on heck of a bunch better without the pin holed converter restriction in the way of the exhaust flow. The Van not only will show a much improved performance, it will give a little better fuel mileage, and the engine ( if in proper tune and all the electronic engine management item's are working properly ) will pass the mandated emissions tests. My converter's are all gone. Gutted. Visually they are still in tact. And the Van's pass with flying colors. A measurable improvement in engine performance over having the pin holed stone in the way. <<Note that some states enforce the fed regs which says if shipped with cat must have a cat. (all passenger vehicles sold in the US and Canada after a certain year in the 70s) If in an air state you most likely will not pass test emissions or visual. jimt On 7/18/05 3:05 PM, "John Bange" <jbange@GMAIL.COM> wrote: Performance, same or maybe slightly better. Mileage, probably no significant change. For emissions, your NOx and carbon monoxide output will go way up. Generally you won't see any significant improvement in power when removing the cat unless you also do something that NEEDS the extra flow, like porting or bigger valves. On 7/18/05, Christopher Gronski <gronski@gmail.com> wrote: This is an poitically incorrect question but I am going to ask it anyway. What happens if you run your vehicle without a catalytic converter installed? Assuming you had a bypass tube installed would you just install your exhaust sensor there? What would the effect on performance and mileage be? How much would your emissions go up? Thanks, Chris>>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »