

| Subject: | Re: How much fuel efficiency gained by shedding 300 lbs? |
| From: | Jake de Villiers |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:58:00 -0700 |
Bingo. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martine Boudreault" <martine.boud@VIDEOTRON.CA> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 2:33 PM Subject: Re: How much fuel efficiency gained by shedding 300 lbs? > If the theory of "wind resistance" vs "weight" is correct, I should not have > a 20" high plastic box on top of my van? > Any comments on large object we may have on top of the front cabin? Should > a small trailer replace such box that increase the wind resistance? > joel > > > ------------------------------------------- > so then the 2 conditions that must be met are: > - same shape > - same surface area > > correct? > > If so, I would argue that no 2 cars models have those in common and thus > the wind resistance for each car is unique. As a result, no one magic > formula can accurately account for how fuel inefficient all vehicles are > unless it includes some kind of unique variable specific to that model of > vehicle. > > as a side, I think what you meant to say was that the density of an object > has no bearing on it's wind resistance. Which is true. However the higher > the density the more energy it will take to change it's relative position > i.e. - Accelerating from 0 to 65 MPH > > > > I think he meant, a 6 ton flat brick has the same wind resistance as a > > 200g flat brick. ;) > > > > On 8/17/05, Brandon <Brandon@concilio.ca> wrote: > >> so by that logic a 1 pound Tear dropped shaped object has the same wind > >> resistance as a 6 ton flat brick. > >> > >> note: our vans more closely resemble the brick :) > >> > >> > >> > My goodness you guys, nobody is thinking, and I can't sit quietly any > >> > longer! > >> > > >> > The mass of the vehicle does not change the wind resistance, or the > >> MPG, > >> > on > >> > the highway. Stop and go or big hills is another story, but on flat > >> ground > >> > at steady speed the van could be 6 tons and you'd get the same MPG. > >> > > >> > At steady speed you are not accellerating the mass, you are only > >> pushing > >> > the > >> > wind out of the way, so mass doesn't matter. > >> > > >> > John > >> > Aircooled.Net Inc. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »