

| Subject: | Re: OT Hurricanes--really an accident? |
| From: | Jim Felder |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:26:27 -0500 |
Wrong. Rush Limbaugh says that environmentalists say that, but they don't say that. Jim On Sep 22, 2005, at 7:07 PM, turbodieseltrooper wrote: > That's the whole point - environmentalists says it's global warming > just > based on the last decade > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "greg crone" <l_levi1@yahoo.com> > To: "turbodieseltrooper" <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:55 AM > Subject: Re: OT Hurricanes--really an accident? > > >> Your're using two sets of numbers containing only 50 >> units each. The standard deviation makes the results >> useless.........Get 10,000 years on both sides of the >> tech and non-tech eras and then you have something to >> compare. >> What you're doing is akin to flipping a coin 5 times >> at night and 5 times in daylight, and saying the >> sunlight caused the difference. >> >> --- turbodieseltrooper >> <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET> wrote: >> >>> >> Global warming is not scientifically PROVEN, and >>> even if it is happening, >>> >> so what? We have NO idea why it's happening. >>> >>> >Not altogether true. Just like in plague times, >>> there were people who knew. >>> >they just didn't have the political voice to >>> convince anyone who mattered. >>> >>> The ones who claim to know are rarley chalenged. >>> They never admit that they >>> are wrong and when proven wrong, they can only >>> resort to name calling. >>> >>> http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdec.shtml >>> >>> This shows the number of hurrican strikes to the US, >>> by decade, since 1851. >>> I didn't plot it on a graph, but it does show signs >>> of a cycle. The sources >>> of greenhouse gases (ie cars) WERE NON existant or >>> small in number (as >>> compared to today) from 1851 to 1910. Now compare >>> this to the years 1951 to >>> 2004 which has lower numbers?? Facts don't lie. t >>> appears that we are on an >>> upward cycle. >>> >>> > don't think we need to think too much beyond >>> simply lowering >>> greenhouse gas output at this point, to cool down >>> what we THINK we've essed >>> up while we search for answers in a scientific >>> environment unfettered by >>> politics. >>> >>> It is the poltics of Socialism that drives the >>> global warming crowd. You >>> only need to look at the Kioto(sp?) accord. By it >>> own reasearch, it will do >>> very little, yet it handicaps the US. >>> >>> gunslinger13x >>> allways outnumbered, never outgunned >>> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »