so what is it based on then? The capt planet cartoons?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Felder" <felder@KNOLOGY.NET>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: OT Hurricanes--really an accident?

> Wrong. Rush Limbaugh says that environmentalists say that, but they
> don't say that.
>
> Jim
>
> On Sep 22, 2005, at 7:07 PM, turbodieseltrooper wrote:
>
>> That's the whole point - environmentalists says it's global warming
>> just
>> based on the last decade
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "greg crone" <l_levi1@yahoo.com>
>> To: "turbodieseltrooper" <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:55 AM
>> Subject: Re: OT Hurricanes--really an accident?
>>
>>
>>> Your're using two sets of numbers containing only 50
>>> units each. The standard deviation makes the results
>>> useless.........Get 10,000 years on both sides of the
>>> tech and non-tech eras and then you have something to
>>> compare.
>>> What you're doing is akin to flipping a coin 5 times
>>> at night and 5 times in daylight, and saying the
>>> sunlight caused the difference.
>>>
>>> --- turbodieseltrooper
>>> <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET> wrote:
>>>
>>>> >> Global warming is not scientifically PROVEN, and
>>>> even if it is happening,
>>>> >> so what? We have NO idea why it's happening.
>>>>
>>>> >Not altogether true. Just like in plague times,
>>>> there were people who knew.
>>>> >they just didn't have the political voice to
>>>> convince anyone who mattered.
>>>>
>>>> The ones who claim to know are rarley chalenged.
>>>> They never admit that they
>>>> are wrong and when proven wrong, they can only
>>>> resort to name calling.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdec.shtml
>>>>
>>>> This shows the number of hurrican strikes to the US,
>>>> by decade, since 1851.
>>>> I didn't plot it on a graph, but it does show signs
>>>> of a cycle. The sources
>>>> of greenhouse gases (ie cars) WERE NON existant or
>>>> small in number (as
>>>> compared to today) from 1851 to 1910. Now compare
>>>> this to the years 1951 to
>>>> 2004 which has lower numbers?? Facts don't lie. t
>>>> appears that we are on an
>>>> upward cycle.
>>>>
>>>> > don't think we need to think too much beyond
>>>> simply lowering
>>>> greenhouse gas output at this point, to cool down
>>>> what we THINK we've essed
>>>> up while we search for answers in a scientific
>>>> environment unfettered by
>>>> politics.
>>>>
>>>> It is the poltics of Socialism that drives the
>>>> global warming crowd. You
>>>> only need to look at the Kioto(sp?) accord. By it
>>>> own reasearch, it will do
>>>> very little, yet it handicaps the US.
>>>>
>>>> gunslinger13x
>>>> allways outnumbered, never outgunned
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>