

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon Definition |
| From: | John Bange |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:17:18 -0700 |
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanagon > > Kind of reads like a 6th grade class report. Hopefully, the author(s) is > not too proud of his work. > Yeah, it's pretty weak. I corrected a couple glaring errors in it the first time I read it 6 months or so ago, but gave up on improving it as it's all pretty lame and needs to be completely rewritten.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »