

| Subject: | Re: Reflectors on back of van |
| From: | BenT Syncro |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:32:12 -0700 |
On 10/13/05, John Bange <jbange@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The white reflective stripes alone at the hieight you have them is > > illegal in all 50. > > > Got any links to documentation on this? California Vehicle Code shows no > reference whatsoever to height with regard to reflective material. The > only > stipulation is that the sum total of everything on the back that reflects > "perceptible light of 0.05 candela or more per foot-candle of incident > illumination" must be "predominately red". So long as his tail lights > provide 51% of the reflected light, he should be OK. No rules on position > or > proximity to one another, so far as I've seen. > Hmmm... looks from the pics that his white reflectors cover a much larger area than the teensy reflectors on Vanagon taillights I have ever encountered. In other words, more than 51%. Check out my Doka's rear: http://members.aol.com/bentbtstr8/images/rearshot.jpg -- BenT
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »