

| Subject: | Re: in the year 2015...... |
| From: | Stan Wilder |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:36:39 -0500 |
I guess I'm lazy, it just takes me longer because I clean everything as it comes out or goes back in. Stan Wilder Engine Ceramics 214-352-4931 www.engineceramics.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey Schwaia" <jeff@VANAGONPARTS.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 10:54 AM Subject: Re: in the year 2015...... > A quick disconnect for the wiring harness on a splittie? Wow, that PO > must've been really bored or really lazy. How many wires are on a splittie > engine... 5? Three for the generator, one for the coil, one for OP switch. > > Back in the early '80s when I was turning wrenches at a VW shop we would > fight for the engine R&R's on splitties. We could do a clutch in about 1.5 > hours. Good money... > > A Vanagon WBX'er engine R&R shouldn't take longer than 3.5 hours for anyone > who's done a few (add an hour if your doing the job in your driveway). > > Cheers, > > Jeff > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM]On Behalf > Of Stan Wilder > Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 7:40 AM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: in the year 2015...... > > > I had a walkthrough split, just by chance. > I had a big case of the dreads when I needed to put a clutch in it but once > I got started I found that the PO had installed a quick disconnect plug on > the wiring harness and then there was just the one fuel line to deal with. > The whole engine came backwards after removal of the rear-most lower body > panel. The R & R only took about two hours since I didn't need to pull the > tranny. > That's a definite upside to the removal of a Vanagon engine at about 12 > hours for an R &R. > > Stan Wilder > Engine Ceramics > 214-352-4931 > www.engineceramics.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Grebneff" <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 11:14 PM > Subject: Re: in the year 2015...... > > > > > >> The down sides to the Bay and Split window are the absence of a big > hole > > >>> over the engine for easy access. > > >> > > >> The 1600-powered Bays had no engine hatch at all! > > > > > >Yeah, & the worst hack in Splitdom, besides the wheel wells being cut > out, > > > > Ugh. > > > > >is to cut in a hatch over the engine to access the AC engine? I've seen > > >restos where they have patched in the hole to make it stock. Nope, > thinking > > >more, the bulkhead removal to make a walk thru is the worst! > > > > So why doidn't they look for a walkthrough Split? Hard to find, > > maybe... then, not all Bays were walkthrough either. > > > > >Tom-don't need no access panel to work on a upright engine, just need 4' > > >long arms. > > > > Dead right! EASY to work on. But I do have long arms... > > -- > > Andrew Grebneff > > Dunedin > > New Zealand > > Fossil preparator > > <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> > > Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut > > > > HUMANITY: THE ULTIMATE VON NEUMANN MACHINE > > > > DEMOCRACY: RULE BY THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »