

| Subject: | Re: What I did a few weeks ago--a pallet in my Vanagon |
| From: | Jim Felder |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:26:09 -0500 |
I had no problems, and it's the third time I've done it for this hundred-mile distance between nashville and my home. I did bottom out on the rough ramp in the parking lot leaving the printer's, but that's it. I still have one load to go for this printing. I've gone shorter distances with more books. It drove well, and I took it carefully and stopped carefully. I had about 30 boxes at about 70 lbs. and a couple of boxes in the back. An iPod and some water bottles and me in the front. Jim On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:03 PM, ' ' wrote: > > <<Did you know that a fork lift could place a standard pallet in the > belly of a Vanagon? > Check out this 2500 lb load.>> > > Sure it will Jim. > That std. pallet will fit right in there, no problem. > > However, allow me to indicate what the Vanagon's suspension rate is at > right at this Kodak Moment. > > Bottomed out, zero. > > If you went more than a block with 2500 lbs. in the belly of that Van > you were pushing the snubber's against the A-Arms. > > > I bought a complete GM 6.2 diesel engine last year, and hauled it home > on a pallet much like the one your using. > > The Van was beyond it's load limitations. > > It bottomed out on every expansion joint of the interstate for 200 > miles. > > And the Van by the way has all new suspension component's front and > rear, including springs. > > I do know that a 6.2 doesn't weigh 2500 lbs. > > This is one thing I sure wouldn't be bragging about. > > It's plain insane, and wacky. > Not the pallet fitting in the Van either. > > The weight that you had in it. > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »