

| Subject: | Re: What I did a few weeks ago--a pallet in my Vanagon |
| From: | Jim Felder |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:33:50 -0500 |
No offense taken of course. More than once I carried a pony over the rough hills of Giles County Tennessee in a 69 bus, that that is another vehicle and another story and probably doesn't exceed the weight in firewood and paving rocks I'd carried in it, either. In the town where I lived there was a guy who hauled concrete blocks in a 67 bug, using the space where he had removed the passenger seat. He carried lots of plywood on the roof rack. Now THAT's crazy. Jim On Oct 27, 2005, at 10:03 PM, Robert Cardo wrote: > For some reason I just can't imagine that a passenger vehicle was > designed to carry more than half it's own weight in books, bricks, > cement, rocks, whatever. > > And it isn't classifeid as a half ton truck. > (I do know that half ton trucks are speced heavier than a Vanagon in > the > frame rails and suspension alone, and I'm not even thinking about the > engine yet) > > No negative vibes, just using some good ole fashioned common sense. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »