Tim,
 I thought that was your van and was about the shoot off an email until I
saw that it was a different year. Now I see my suspicion was right after
all. You should place one of those "RE: " ads.
 BenT

 On 10/29/05, Aristotle Sagan <killer.jupiter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My resonse to this joker...
>
> "First off. It's an 84.
>
> Second off, where did you get 26 MPG. It gets 18.
>
> Third off. there is no jack. And did you list that the gas tank will only
> take 6 gallons of gas before leaking?
>
> Fourth off, did you note that there is no antenna and that needs to be
> taken
> care of?
>
> Fifth off, Please send my parking permit back. There is no insurance on
> the
> van any more and the DMV has been notified that I no longer own the van.
> You
> can not drive it on the street legally.
>
> Sixth off, you can seat no more than 6 in the van, even if you fix the
> jump
> seat behind the drivers seat.
>
> Please fix you ad to represent what is actually going on with the van.
>
> tim
> "
>
> On 10/29/05, Aristotle Sagan <killer.jupiter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > http://www.craigslist.com/pen/car/107508824.html
> >
> > Hmmm... Ever seen a vanagon get 26 MPG? When I owned it (sold it on
> > Friday) it got 18. He musta done a tuneup.
> >
> > The van was worth more than 700 bucks, but... $1850?
> >
> > I am sitting here... amazed. I feel for anybody who buys it.
> >
> > tim in san jose
> >
> > --
> > Where ever you are, there you be. Unless you're driving my van, in which
> > case, you ain't got there yet.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Where ever you are, there you be. Unless you're driving my van, in which
> case, you ain't got there yet.
>

--
BenT