

| Subject: | Re: Front vs Rear Shock Absorbers |
| From: | Dave Vickery |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:25:25 +0000 |
I agree. Seems like wheels and shocks all fall into the same over-promoted category. I replaced Boge OEM front shocks on my Westy with Bilstein HD shocks. And yes it makes a difference on forest roads, but nothing like what people say. My Boge it turns out lasted 15 years and still seemed fine when I took them out. I was so under impressed by the difference in the front shocks that I haven't replaced the rears yet. >From: jake beaulieu <jbeaulie@ND.EDU> >Reply-To: jake beaulieu <jbeaulie@ND.EDU> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Front vs Rear Shock Absorbers >Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:32:43 -0500 > >About a year ago I replaced the rear shocks on my 1982 Westy with a new set >of BOGEs. I am not sure what brand the old ones were, but they were >totally >worn out with barely any resistance left. I can honestly say that I >noticed >absolutely no difference in the ride. > >I still need to replace the front shocks and I am wondering what kind of a >difference it will make it. Do the front shocks tend to have a greater >impact on the ride than the rears? > >Jake
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »