

| Subject: | Re: Metric this, metric that |
| From: | Aaron Pearson |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:47:01 -0600 |
i can count on my fingers the reasons why decimal measurements are the easiest to work with. aaron '87 syncro westy ej22 >From: Florian Speier <groups.florian@GMAIL.COM> >Reply-To: Florian Speier <groups.florian@GMAIL.COM> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: Metric this, metric that >Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:24:02 +0000 > >jake, > >as an architect i hope you are joking. >simplle question: if your architect/builder/whatever hands you an 1:1 >model, >how many times smaller is it than what you finally get? > >answer: 12 times. 1:1 means 1 foot=1inch....... so, how many times smaller >is a 1:3/4 model/plan? > >car example. wrench sizes 1/8, 3/16, 1/4, 5/16, 3/8........ >isnt it easier to say 12, 13, 14, 15? > >coming to your playwood example: true, if you keep the same size. but just >cut them 2.5m x 5m > >welcome to the new tire thread. hope this doesnt dissolve into US vs the >rest of the world...... > >florian > > > >On 1/30/06, Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Worse than that Kim, they use kilopascals, and I'll send you one if you > > really want one! I still don't know whether the barometric pressure is > > fair > > or foul! > > If you think the metric system is cool, try living with the stuff. It is > > completely non-intuitive and indeed was designed by the French to be >that > > way! A 4 x 8 sheet of plywood is theoretically 2440 x 4880 mm. No way. >If > > you ask someone to show you with their hands what 2 feet looks like, >most > > people get pretty close - ask them to show you 60 centimeters and >they're > > stumped. With feet and inches I can divide a foot by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and > > 12. > > With metric, you can only use 1, 2, 5 and 10, making it much more > > difficult > > to use in construction. The CBC, because it is funded by the Canadian > > Government, had to convert all its scenery to metric! Cost a lot for >zero > > gain. > > > > I'm surprised that I am still so pissed off that we went Metric, but > > really, there is no good reason to use it in your daily life. I already > > have > > tons of wrenches in Imperial and Metric, and that's where it should have > > stopped. > > > > Sorry for the tirade. I feel calmer now. > > > > Feet and inches, chains and rods, gallons and miles forever! > > > > On 1/30/06, Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@mac.com> wrote: > > > > > > Okay, for all you folk that are so high on converting to the metric > > > system....what's the pressure in your tires? Uh, huh. What's that PSI > > > thing again? > > > > > > So, let's see would that be 2.75 bar in my tires...or 3.3 when fully > > > loaded. Bah, let's use hectopascals instead. 2750 or 3300 (roughly). > > > > > > Hmm, I wonder where I can get a tire gauge that measures in > > > hectopascals. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jake > > 1984 Vanagon GL > > 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" > > www.crescentbeachguitar.com > > _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »