

| Subject: | Re: Metric this, metric that |
| From: | Jeff Palmer |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:44:36 -0600 |
How is 70 degrees Fahrenheit more user friendly or more 'appropriate' than 20 degrees Celsius? I'm a big fan of tradition, but how can it get simpler than things that are based on/divisible by ten/100/1000 etc. Measuring weather is just as arbitrary as measuring anything else. And where I live, -40 is seen often enough regardless of which system you use. Ok guys quit baiting me! You know i can't resist! Jeff >From: Jim Felder <felder@KNOLOGY.NET> >Reply-To: Jim Felder <felder@KNOLOGY.NET> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: Metric this, metric that >Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:57:41 -0600 > >John, > >You saved me the trouble of sending what I just wrote, almost exactly >what you wrote. > >Jim > >On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:33 AM, John Bange wrote: > >>>Non-intuitive? Water freezes at 0, boils at 100. How is that not >>>intuitive?? >>> >>>Not so much non-intuitive as under-descriptive. Freezing and boiling >>>of >>water are really only convenient marking points for scientists and >>engineers. The freezing and boiling point of water at sea level are, in >>fact, utterly arbitrary marking points! Why not the boiling point of >>alcohol? Or the freezing point of mercury? When most people talk >>temperature, they're talking weather. In that regard, the Fahrenheit >>scale >>has a more appropriate scaling. Most human-habitable areas experience >>temperatures that range inside 0-100F for the most part. Centigrade, >>though, >>is optimized for science, which marks the same temperature range as >>-17 to >>37C. This results in a rather overly-coarse degree of resolution, >>forcing >>the use of an awkward decimal place for certain applications. The >>metric >>system is indeed very logical and rational, but it lacks the same >>degree of >>seat-of-the-pants convenience the older systems. The fact that we have >>calculators now has obscured for many people the fact that (10 fingers >>notwithstanding) we can't easily do decimal math in our heads. Our >>brains >>are MUCH better at estimating halves, thirds, quarters, etc. The >>original >>French metric system is very much a product of the "Age of >>Enlightenment", >>with science and rationality being emphasized over tradition. This >>resulted >>in a quite a bit of reasonably useful traditional baby being thrown >>out with >>the bathwater. The metric system is great, but there are several places >>where, for reasons of internal consistency based on scientific >>convenience, >>it fails to achieve the same degree of conventional utility as the >>system it >>replaced. >> >>-- >>John Bange >>'90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger" >> _________________________________________________________________ MSN� Calendar keeps you organized and takes the effort out of scheduling get-togethers. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN� Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »