

| Subject: | Re: A Little Humor - How many list members does it take to change a lightbulb? |
| From: | BenT Syncro |
| Date: | Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:30:36 -0800 |
So what's the total? BenT On 2/26/06, samc <samc@surfglobal.net> wrote: > > This came in from a scuba dive list I read and learn from... But, it could > probably just as easily be used for the members of several other affinity, > activity, interest area, community, ultra-something or other, and other > lists I can think of where all sorts of "Ex Spurts" (Former Drips of Water > Under Pressure) hang their brains, fingers, emotions, intellect and egos. > > There are folks receiving this who belong to several affinity groups where > I > belong as well. The comment above, and the humor expressed below is not > meant for anyone specifically in my address book, and I'm sure everyone > receiving this can think of other groups where similar dynamics are played > out ... > > As we "say" in the Amateur Radio community, "73." > > Sam Conant > > One to change the light bulb and to post that the > light bulb has been changed. > > Fourteen to share similar experiences of changing > light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently. > > Seven to caution about the dangers of changing light > bulbs. > > Seven more to point out spelling/grammar errors in > posts about changing light bulbs. > > Five to flame the spell checkers. > > Three to correct spelling/grammar flames. > > Six to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... > > Another six to condemn those six as stupid. > > Fifteen to claim experience in the lighting industry > and give the correct spelling. > > Nineteen to post that this group is not about light > bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb (or light bulb) > forum. > > Eleven to defend the posting to the group saying that > we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this group. > > Thirty six to debate which method of changing light > bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what > brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are > faulty. > > Seven to post URLs where one can see examples of > different light bulbs. > > Four to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly and > then post the corrected URL. > > Three to post about links they found from the URLs > that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs > relevant to this group. > > Thirteen to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including > all headers and signatures, and add "Me too" > > Five to post to the group that they will no longer > post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy. > > Four to say "didn't we go through this already a short > time ago?" > > Thirteen to say "do a Google search on light bulbs > before posting questions about light bulbs." > > Three to tell a funny story about their cat and a > light bulb. > AND > > One group lurker to respond to the original post 6 > months from now with something unrelated they found at > snopes.com<about:blank> and start it all over again! > > Oh yea. this one Ken from the Frozen North will get a > kick out of! > > One Quacker who says I'm right your wrong...TRUST ME! > -- BenT
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »