

| Subject: | Re: mpg |
| From: | Paul Connelly |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Apr 2006 12:37:53 -0600 |
Interesting: Back to my original theory that it's basically all the same - Less drag from less dense air, needs less power, but less dense air = less oxygen = less power, requires more air/fuel to overcome drag... I live in the mountains because of the scenery, and quality of life (amongst other things), but if you want to move to save a few cents on gas - there's plenty of room... Paul Connelly '86 Syncro Westy - Hummingbird 9,100' Frisco CO. On 4/7/06, Alistair Bell <albell@uvic.ca> wrote: > > Calculation aid here: > > http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_hp_dp.htm > > > Alistair > > '82 westy, diesel converted to gas in '94 > http://www.members.shaw.ca/albell/ > > On 6-Apr-06, at 10:27 PM, John Reddick wrote: > > The air is thinner at higher elevations. A Vanagon, or anything else, > at 70 mph at 6000' elevation, has less total drag than the same > vahicle at > sea level going the same 70 mph. It therefore requires less power, and > gasoline, to go the same speed. That is why 747's cruise at 35,000 > feet, > instead of 200 feet. > > John > VANARU.COM >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »