

| Subject: | Re: SA mud flaps |
| From: | Dave Vickery |
| Date: | Thu, 4 May 2006 14:37:26 +0000 |
I got mine from one of the other vendors and they must all be the same, at least for the cheaper version discussed. They were about $125 for a set of 4 and the quality is not up to US or german standards, but after having them on for a while you wouldn't notice it. They fit good but because they mount in the wheel well they reduce clearance if you run big tires on a syncro. They also don't do much in the front to block mud. The wheel still sprays the side of the van during turns. I am thinking of using flexible PVC about 3 inches wide (wider at the bottom) with pop-top edging to hold the PVC to the wheel well (It will stick out 90 degrees from the side of the van and should do a better job of blocking the mud. Like you see on some 4x4 jeeps with big tires. Dave in Denver >From: Sam Stone <svs3@SBCGLOBAL.NET> >Reply-To: Sam Stone <svs3@SBCGLOBAL.NET> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: SA mud flaps >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:02:08 -0500 > >The GoWesty mud flaps are packaged with just screws no clips and are >attached by at least three screws a piece. They mount directly to the >outside of the wheel arch and the inside rear of the wheel well. I think >I might try the ones I linked above and compare the two. At any rate, >even if they are the same as the GW they are cheaper. > > > >Sam Stone wrote: >>Hi all, >> >>Just recieved my new SA mud flaps for GoWesty and I am not too >>impressed. They are a thinnish plastic material - not very durable >>appearing though the fit looks good and they are plenty wide to keep the >>black road/tire film from coating the sides of the van. >> >>What are others experience wth these flaps? Are they more durable than >>they seem? >>Are the GoWesty (and other American vendors) SA mud flaps the same as >>these http://www.southafrica-parts.de/na/? >>Are there better after-market mud flaps than these? >> >>Thanks for any insight as I am trying to decide whether or not to return >>them or not. >> >>Thanks, >>Sam >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>Text inserted by Panda Platinum 2006 Internet Security: >> >>This message has NOT been classified as spam. If it is unsolicited >>mail (spam), click on the following link to reclassify it: >>http://127.0.0.1:6083/Panda?ID=pav_29407&SPAM=true >>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »