

| Subject: | Re: maybe too much information is worse... |
| From: | BenT Syncro |
| Date: | Sun, 14 May 2006 18:23:35 -0700 |
On 5/14/06, John Bange <jbange@gmail.com> wrote: > > Drove from Los Angles to Las Vegas today, and I'll be darned if it didn't > make it just fine! I wonder, though, if I might be better off not knowing > my > oil temperature. In sunny but mild LA, I never got the thing to read above > 200degF/95degC of so, even diving full-bore, 80mph up short but fairly > steep > grades; But today driving out of Baker, CA in 109 degree heat up that > long, > long grade I was seeing oil temps a hair over the 220F/105C. Oil pressure > was hovering around 20psi though, so no problem there I reckon. The oil > temp > made me twitchy of course, but only because the only thing I know is that > it's "higher than it's ever been before". So long as I'm seeing good oil > pressure, is temperature not a big deal? Is there a temperature one should > stay under? If all I had was the water temp gauge and oil blinkenlight, I > would never have known any of this. I'm I suffering paranoia because I > know > too much? > I drive to Vegas and back to SF all the time and hardly even pay attention to my temp gauge. I am generally more concerned with my brains temperature than my Doka. Never misses a beat. Got get myself AC. Last trip was 16 hours round trip LA to SF in one day. -- BenT
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »