

| Subject: | Re: conflicting cooling problem data...(this one is for the true experts...) |
| From: | Robert Fisher |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:16:43 -0700 |
Have you ever gone here: http://tech.bentleypublishers.com/forum.jspa?forumID=49&start=0 ? There may be something in those archives, or somebody may know... I think the moderator of that board was on the list, I dunno if he still is or not. Cya, Robert ----- Original Message ----- From: "robert shawn feller" <carboncow@GMAIL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 6:35 PM Subject: Re: conflicting cooling problem data...(this one is for the true experts...) > for those following my search for correct ohm readings at a given temp for > the Coolant Temp Sender...I have not finished my question yet, but I did > get > up this piece of info I bugged the Bentley people for last fall. Not very > specific but it shows that Ken's numbers are accurate readings and the > chart > I had originally was for the temp2 sensor, which has different readings. > see > pdf here I posted on my site: > > http://carboncow.net/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?cid=3&lid=4 > > My quest continues for more specific readings over the full range. Since I > was told this a standard VDO sender range (although it may be a bosch > sender) therefor the range has to be published somewhere! > > Shawn > > On 6/24/06, robert shawn feller <carboncow@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> dan, >> >> i think you must have a 1.9 then as my water temp sender is two wires >> coming from the housing (2.1L), i don't ground tot he housing and have >> checked my ground wire. as you state that would give me a low reading and >> not high which is my problem. >> >> ken just said he tested both the water sender and the temp2 side by side >> with different readings/curves...i don't see how there can be 1000ohm >> difference as he states...mine are almost identical in readings at any >> time. >> >> >> Shawn >> >> >> On 6/24/06, Daniel Katz <katzd54@yahoo.com> wrote: >> > >> > robert: >> > >> > what i am calling temp i is one wire temp gauge >> > sending unit, grounded via threads. temp ii is two >> > wire sensor for ecu. common set-up, not peculaliar to >> > german cars. temp verses resistance characteristics >> > are close for i and ii - many k ohm cold, 100's of >> > ohms operating temp. poorly bonded thermostat housing >> > (i.e., poor ground) will not effect temp ii, but will >> > make temp gauge read low as current from temp i has to >> > flow through high resistance to ground. >> > >> > dan >> > >> > --- robert shawn feller <carboncow@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Dan, >> > > >> > > Do you have confirmation or a chart that the temp2 >> > > sensor has the same ohm >> > > readings for a given temp. If so why wouldn't the >> > > design allow the ECU and >> > > the Temp Gauge to work off the same sender (rather >> > > rudant don't you think) >> > > or why wouldn't they make the parts interchangable >> > > then in the housing? (i'm >> > > trying rationalize german over engineering! this is >> > > the same company that >> > > puts two pressure sensors on the master cylinder for >> > > the brake lights!) >> > > >> > > Can I simply share the connections on the temp2 >> > > sensor as I recall the van >> > > doesn't run so great with the temp2 disconnected, or >> > > maybe it just doesn't >> > > like to start. >> > > >> > > I'll start with this idea. >> > > >> > > Shawn >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 6/24/06, Daniel L. Katz <katzd54@yahoo.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > obviously a bad temp i sending unit. >> > > > >> > > > could prove this by heating in water on the stove >> > > and monitoring both >> > > > sensor resistance and water temp. >> > > > >> > > > other confirmation would be to test temp ii >> > > sensor, which has similar >> > > > specified temperature-resistance characteristics. >> > > > >> > > > dan >> > > > >> > > > On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:40:29 -0400, robert shawn >> > > feller >> > > > <carboncow@GMAIL.COM> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > >I've just about had it trying to figure out why >> > > my gauge/LED tell me I'm >> > > > >running very warm and often "hot" when I'm >> > > stopped. >> > > > > >> > > > >I've got conflicting troubleshooting info >> > > everywhere, here is the >> > > > process: >> > > > > >> > > > >this spring my temp gauge was running very low. >> > > Tests showed a faulty >> > > > temp1 >> > > > >sender unit. I got a new unit from van-cafe.com >> > > along with a new stock >> > > > >thermostat. Instantly my gauge was now showing >> > > high with intermittent LED >> > > > >activity (not due to the level). I doubted the >> > > gauge so I pulled out my >> > > > 3M >> > > > >Non Contact Thermometer and it shows EVERYTHING >> > > seams fine, block and >> > > > >coolant hoses are all below 196F. I double >> > > checked my fan and its working >> > > > >all speeds. van-cafe.com was nice enough to send >> > > me another sender unit >> > > > >although they doubted there was a failure in the >> > > sender. I replaced the >> > > > >sender along with another thermostat and guess >> > > what, still running hot. I >> > > > >owed them $12! >> > > > > >> > > > >Before I replace the radiator and fan thermal >> > > switch as many have >> > > > >recommended I wanted to check a few things. R. >> > > Mathiew sent me a OHM >> > > > chart >> > > > >showing the resistance at all temps. Now I see a >> > > problem unless his chart >> > > > is >> > > > >wrong. >> > > > >With a COLD engine the OHM reading should be >> > > 1500-2000 according to his >> > > > >chart, but my reading on my FLUKE multitester >> > > shows 800OHM, this was >> > > > >confirmed with a less professional unit. As the >> > > engine warms the chart >> > > > also >> > > > >shows that the "high" temps should be between >> > > 160-220OHM at 212F. All >> > > > >readings on the multitester came way to early, I >> > > was still able to touch >> > > > >hoses when the reading on the ohms said my hand >> > > should be burnt. Took the >> > > > >van around the block and its been idling for 30 >> > > minutes and the reading >> > > > is >> > > > >currently 62.4 OHM which should have my engine >> > > block melting. My 3M tells >> > > > me >> > > > >the hottest pipe from the water pump to the >> > > thermostat housing is only >> > > > 196F >> > > > >and hottest spot I can find on the engine block >> > > is 192F. The fan has yet >> > > > to >> > > > >cycle today as it is 82F in Ohio but it has >> > > cycled before in hotter >> > > > weather. >> > > > >I'm quite sure that thermoswitch is working fine. >> > > > > >> > > > >I built a resistance box to test the dash guage >> > > and it works 100% OK. The >> > > > >gauge shows the proper locations for a given >> > > resistance. I have not >> > > > checked >> > > > >voltage at the gauge but if my resistance box >> > > shows proper numbers I >> > > > should >> > > > >be OK. Additionally my mutitester readings are >> > > showing the same "high" >> > > > >readings from the sender unit. So here are my >> > > questions: >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > - Does anyone think I've got to bad sender >> > > unit, again? (bad >> > > > > batch/run?) >> > > > > - Could the OHM readings given to me be >> > > incorrect? (I'll display them >> > > > > below) >> > > > > - What else can I do before I spend (as some >> > > recommend) $200 on a >> > > > > radiator and fan thermswitch, which doesn't >> > > make sense to me at this >> > > > time. >> > > > > There has been much talk about radiator flow >> > > restriction. >> > > > > - Would you not agree that the metal pipe from >> > > the water pump to >> > > > > thermostat housing is the hottest water >> > > reading for an thermo-gun and >> > > > 196F >> > > > > is acceptable? >> > > > > - Get a sender from another vendor? (that >> > > would make three!) >> > > > > >> > > > >I know many have stated to check wiring but and >> > > increase in resistance >> > > > from >> > > > >old wiring or bad ground would show a low reading >> > > as when my first sender >> > > > >failed. >> > > > > >> > > > >I was told this sender is a standard VDO ohm >> > > range so can someone check >> > > > >these temp to ohm numbers below. I cannot find >> > > data in Bentley or other >> > > > >sources. >> > > > > >> > > > >Lastly I pulled the Coolant Level Warning sender >> > > last weekend and I >> > > > forget >> > > > >where it goes in the relay/fuse box. Top row far >> > > right? >> > > > > >> > > > >Temperature sensor resistance >> > > > > >> > > > >F (C) Ohms >> > > > >50 10 3100-4100 >> > > > >68 20 2000-3000 >> > > > >86 30 1500-2000 >> > > > >104 40 1000-1500 >> > > > >122 50 750- 950 >> > > > >140 60 540- 650 >> > > > >158 70 380- 480 >> > > > >176 80 290- 360 >> > > > >194 90 205- 280 >> > > > >212 100 160- 220 >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >Thanks. >> > > > > >> > > > >-- >> > > > >shawn feller, ohio >> > > > >1986 vw vanagon gl westfalia >> > > > >1993 vw eurovan gl >> > > > >plus a couple of saabs, boats, jet skis, dog and >> > > wife (all require to >> > > > much >> > > > >maintenance, accept the dog)... >> > > > > >> > > > > www.carboncow.com >> > > > >www.carboncow.net >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > === message truncated === >> > >> > >> > __________________________________________________ >> > Do You Yahoo!? >> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> > http://mail.yahoo.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> shawn feller, ohio >> 1986 vw vanagon gl westfalia >> 1993 vw eurovan gl >> plus a couple of saabs, boats, jet skis, dog and wife (all require to >> much >> maintenance, accept the dog)... >> >> www.carboncow.com >> www.carboncow.net >> > > > > -- > shawn feller, ohio > 1986 vw vanagon gl westfalia > 1993 vw eurovan gl > plus a couple of saabs, boats, jet skis, dog and wife (all require to much > maintenance, accept the dog)... > > www.carboncow.com > www.carboncow.net
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »