

| Subject: | Re: Fuel gauge sending unit resistance |
| From: | John Bange |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:47:44 -0700 |
On 7/29/06, Larry Alofs <lalofs@rcn.com> wrote: > > I don't know if it will help for those involved with the current fuel > gauge thread, but it seems like this data should be in the archives; I > could not find it in my Bentley. > > I took the gas tank out of my "91 GL recently to replace the grommets > and for future reference measured the resistance of the level sensor. > > With the empty tank upside down so that the float was in the "full" > position, the sender measured a reliable 35 ohms. > > With it right side up, the "empty" position, the minimum consistent > resistance was 450 ohms. > Looking through the Bentley I notice there are two sets of test values for the VW1301 for testing the fuel gauge. One set is under [1980-1984] and shows 55=full, 560=empty (equaling 38 and 392 ohms, respectively). The other is under [Water-cooled from 1985] and shows 50=full, 320=empty (35 and 210 ohms). Then, looking through the ETKA section on fuel senders, I see there's a 251 919 051 E wit a note saying ">> 25-H-082 433", and a 251 919 051 K with a note saying "25-H-082 434>>". If these are VINs, I guess that would indicate they changed something in the middle of the '87 model year? It must have been only a mounting or electrical connector change, though, as I see only two models of fuel gauge (251 919 031 or 031A) for all of 1980-1992. Anyone got a theory on why Bentley shows two different ohm ranges for testing supposedly the same gauge? -- John Bange '90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »