

| Subject: | Re: Reasonable cruising speed? |
| From: | Dennis Haynes |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:00:41 -0400 |
There are many software packages and the GPS antennae plugs into a USB port. I think I paid about $150 for the "kit" 4 years ago. Sometimes it can be tempermental and I never got the voice navigation to work right but for planning and tracking, it works well. Zoomed in this thing will track lane changes on the highway. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: Craig Morton <rangermorton1972@YAHOO.COM> Date: Friday, August 4, 2006 1:49 pm Subject: Re: Reasonable cruising speed? > Dennis: > > How do you get a GPS in a laptop? > > Craig > > Dennis Haynes <dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET> wrote: > I have a GPS in my laptop. It can actually track road distance > traveled and it does also calculate altitude, quite well. When you > travel in the hills, you can become confused thnking you are going > down hill when in fact you are still climbing or vice versa. > > Dennis > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ken Lake > Date: Friday, August 4, 2006 12:42 pm > Subject: Re: Reasonable cruising speed? > > > Ok, I admit to having studied this several years ago, and my > personal> handheld GPS does operate this way. It would certainly be > > possible to > > sum up the distances between plotted points and get true > distance of > > travel. Mine does not have the memory or computing power for that. > > > > The distance reported is accurate. It is within about 50 feet, > closer> if allowed to average for a while. Mine operates in the mode > > where it > > will tell me the distance from any set point (like HOME) to where > > I am > > at. Or between any two set points, but it is always straight > line, not > > track. It does store track information but does not use it for > > distance. Now that you can get 4GB of memory in an Ipod Nano, it > > wouldcertainly be possible for some one to build that in. The > > laptop could > > be programmed to add up incremental distances reported by the > GPS over > > time and I am sure this program exists somewhere. I have a lower > > budgetthan that. > > > > GPS uses a very accurate time system, and can calculate the > > position to > > within 50 ft (or less) and so the speed is very accurate. Total > > distance is very accurate since the error tends to average out, > > but mine > > does not do track distance. Newer one's may. I probably should not > > have generalized quite so much. There is a larger error in elevation > > (less than 200 ft)since it is very hard to triangulate elevation > from> the satellites. > > > > Ken > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On > > BehalfOf Loren Busch > > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 11:00 AM > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > Subject: Re: Reasonable cruising speed? > > > > Interesting point and one that was discussed quite a bit a > couple of > > years > > ago. Assuming you are correct then that would say that GPS indicated > > speed > > is only correct when traveling a straight road. And what does > > that say > > about the ground track trace most, even older GPS units, store? And > > what of > > the newer GPS units , especially those designed for use in > > vehicle? Do > > they > > provide more accurate data, or, like my older hand held unit > (Magellan> 4000) > > give bad info on the odometer function? > > BTW, not trying to get an argument going here, just really curious > > aboutother peoples real world experience with hand helds vs. GPS > > units sold > > for > > use in vehicles vs. laptop software/GPS combinations. > > Guess I'll have to set up both the handheld and the laptop and run > > themtogether for a hundred miles or so and then compare. > > > > On 8/4/06, Ken Lake wrote: > > > > > > RE: GPS distance. > > > > > > This is because the GPS calculates the straight line distance > > between> the starting and ending points. Although it calculates > > its exact > > > location several times a second and uses that to determine its > > speed,it > > > does not store the incremental distances between locations, > > which it > > > would need to calculate total distance. Hence it can plot your > > trip,> give you the speed, current location, but distance from > > starting is > > > always wrong (compared to how you got there) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger�s low PC-to-Phone > call rates. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »